Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
The US government is unique in the world as that it has to balance the interests of a hardcore Christian in the south, a New York atheist, a naturalized Indian in Texas, and hundreds of more niche groups. No other country has this kind of diversity
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Have you ever left the US

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Used to be a lot more unified when we were the super majority

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Diversity is our downfall

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11w

You’re a traitor people said diversity will be our downfall back in 1789 when that same government had to balance the interests of quakers and puritans and loyalists and French and plantations and all the other factions

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

Yea I am, fuck this country it sucks

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

All Europeans btw.

upvote 6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

We did and we didn’t. Interests of the French were easy fuck up the British. Most of the religious sects stayed neutral or joined both sides in equal amounts. The allowance of slavery by our government to cater to the economic and cultural beliefs of the southern colonists would lead to civil war and hundreds more years of oppression and discrimination. Diversity is a sword it can be a nations greatest strength or thing that kills it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Those Europeans were murdering each other in the streets. Protestants and Catholics were burning down each others churches. That’s a level of division we don’t even see between Christians and Muslims in this country today.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Germans and Central Europeans weren’t accepted until the late 1800s Irish and Italians and Jews weren’t accepted until the mid-late 1900s lightskin Hispanics until the 2010s. Conservatives have been complaining about diversity for centuries now and our country has only gotten stronger until the powers that be decided once again to put us against each other while they get richer

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Who is “we” bc Irish and Italians would like to have a word

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

European society’s are successful in diversity because all Europeans have enough in common. Diversity doesn’t include sub-Saharan Africans who couldn’t invent the wheel. Look at Africa and parts of Asia, I don’t see you telling them they need more diversity?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

I’m irish and we acutely assimilated.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Yeah and after how many generations of running ethnic mafias and getting discriminated against? The Somalis just got here

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

P sure the indians down the street from me are assimilated enough to spell actually vs acutely🤣

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

Bro again Europeans were slaughtering each other like pigs in the trenches because of ethnicity and religion until big mutt daddy America came into the picture. I don’t give a shit about diversity in Africa and Asia because they’re neither nations of immigrants nor global empires like we are. China has been Han supremacist for almost its entire existence while weve been mixing ethnicities for our own

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 11w

The concept of “Europeans” being a bloc of people who all look and think the same only came in the early 1900s when the big empires needed a way to differentiate themselves from their colonies in the third world

upvote 1 downvote