Anonymous #1 1w

Google if there is a genocide in Palestine and get back to me on that

15

Anonymous OP 1w

There’s not, and there’s also no “Palestine”

-7

Anonymous #1 1w

What did Google say?

14

Anonymous #1 1w

What do experts say? What do professionals who spend years of their life perfecting their expertise?

19

Anonymous OP 1w

Victims of genocide don’t normally have the option to end the war by returning hostages they stole from their families

-4

Anonymous #1 1w

And they don’t lol you’re just academically dishonest

10

Anonymous OP 1w

They do, they choose to play games with the hostages instead

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

Ah yes innocent civilians (>80% of the casualties, that’s why it’s a genocide) are known to be the ones to negotiate hostages. Please read a book.

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Oh here we go with the 80% lie again. It’s been debunked, you know it’s been debunked, you just don’t care cuz it supports your narrative

-4

Anonymous #1 1w

You’re a victim of confirmation bias. Otherwise you would just agree with the experts and professionals. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359189/full

3

Anonymous OP 1w

If there is a dealership with 1000 cars on the lot and they list 200 Toyotas on the website is it an intellectually honest claim to say the 80% of the cars on the lot are Hondas (This is a yes or no answer)

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

Dawg, saying that pointing out the evil actions of a single group of Jews amounts to antisemitism against all Jews only strengthens the real antisemitic narratives that it’s all Jews.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Defending ourselves from terrorism is not evil. Go away antisemite

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Yes your hypothetical scenario has nothing to do with how professionals view data. They obtain as much as they can. It’s academically dishonest to choose an even smaller sample size that is purposely skewed. So they don’t do that. If you read any of the studies on the data, you would find that is the case.

2