
1) theyre never defending themselves, and if they had to they wouldnt need a gun even an eigth of that size 2) they are doing no law enforcement, especially not with that 3) sorry ive been at a shooting and we live in a country where shootings are extremely common because everyone needs to vaporize my body in 10 seconds with their self protection toy 4) not sure what reason i have to have any faith in law enforcement to be remotely reasonable or responsible
1) person who doesn't know shit about guns telling me what gun is the most effective- lol 2) then why did you call them that? 3) the problem in Norinco wasn't that the robbers had guns, it was that they had homemade body armor that could tank the 9mm rounds and shotgun pellets being fired at them 4) if you already don't think they are responsible and act unlawfully, why not do something about that instead?
Miranda warnings, mandatory deescalation training, body cams, duty to intervene, chokehold/carotid artery restraint bans, independent prosecutors for police involved shootings, mandatory reporting for use of force incidents, whistleblower protections for officers, national decertification databases, and many more.
1) doesnt know shit about guns telling you whats most effective? its like carrying around a 50 pound sword versus one thats 2 pounds. 50 pound sword isnt gonna defend you thats obliterating someone. shut your fuck up man 2) theyre police. they sit around and do nothing. thats not law enforcement, its intimidation except nobody that needs to be intimidated is 3) man i cant believe hollywood shooting with body armor thats never happened in new york requires police to scare the shit out of everyone
1) The differences between a glock 17 (average duty pistol) and an ar15 (average duty rifle) is that an ar15 can hold an extra 13 rounds and the smaller ar15 bullet has more velocity allowing it to penetrate certain body armor, its not gonna obliterate you lol 2) police means LE 3) still happened in the US and the reason you see that carry over is because US police share policies across departments 4) here's a novel idea: what if police both had the means to protect civilians and didn't oppress
1) man they sure are using those extra rounds and that extra velocity! not like those bullets are any different or anything either, the fire rate isnt faster, nothing! 2) wow genius over here figured out the big question. its almost like i specifically addressed what you just said but youre too illiterate to have picked up on it! 3) the louvre robbery just happened, should all of france now equip deadly and extreme measures to prevent a street baker from having the same thing? 4) what if. yes!
1) Fire rate is slower on an AR15 than a glock, and as I said the bullet itself is smaller 2) don't say stuff if you mean something else 3) don't remember the part in the response to the Louvre robbery where the robbers killed 20 people and the police had to bumrush a gun store to break through their body armor 4) atleast there's some agreement here
98% of people in prison are there on a plea deal, meaning without a trial so I gotta tell you I’m not convinced it’s actually doing good. And they’re being used for enslaved labor in a multi billion dollar industry. And also, many of these private prisons have mandatory minimum capacities—which means there is no incentive to lower crime. “Don’t commit crimes” I hear you say. If criminals don’t have rights, what happens if the govt decides you’re a criminal?
also like... they come out swinging saying "oh youre rich youre insulated and out of touch" then to say theyre buying a house with cash (anomaly) at age 20 (like 15-20 yrs sooner than the median first time homebuyer) because you very very very clearly sarcastically said youre rich and golf