Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Unskilled labor is almost always just a way to say you think the poor should remain poor, and are disposable.
upvote 33 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

What are we supposed to call jobs that can’t really be trained for on the job or immediately? CNAs, plumbers, mechanics, X-ray techs, etc.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

“Unskilled labor” is a capitalist myth used to justify paying poverty wages

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Depends. Someone like Marx, who used this term and famously didn’t think that, used it to distinguish between types of labor based on how extensive of an education they require.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

CNAs literally have a classroom based training program, plumbers and mechanics often have apprenticeships, and I believe x-ray techs also have formal training

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

That’s my point. They usually require formal training and even licensing. Unskilled labor usually doesn’t

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

ah i got you, i thought you were listing those as unskilled labor. my issue isn’t with the actual classification/distinction, but overwhelmingly the term is used as a pejorative to imply that people shouldn’t enjoy labor protections, or that they don’t ‘matter’

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Oh 💀 I thought you just didn’t like the term lol. No I absolutely think everyone should have labor protections

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I mean unskilled is a bit harsh, especially considering many of the jobs frequently described as ‘unskilled’ take a significant amount of experience/time before you actually become proficient. like everyone shits on fast food but working in a drive thru is fucking brutal

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yeah, I see what you mean. Idk what else it would be called though

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

I mean is it really a necessary distinction? we can just call jobs with formal training semi-professional or licensure based employment, and then you’re increasing the prestige of jobs, rather than demeaning it

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

I’m not an economist but I think they’re the ones that use that distinction the most. I think both of those terms work tbh. Non-licensure-based doesn’t sound too bad

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

and again, my complaint isn’t with the word, in fact i’m not even complaining. I’m just saying that 90% of the time when people use that term, it is to demean workers and talk down to people without professional certification

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

yeah ig i’ve been seeing it a lot because some unionized starbucks locations are being closed where Im from, and the same people who bitch all day about law and order suddenly don’t care about the enforcement of laws when it’s labor protections and federal rights to organize

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

They might be victims to anti-union/right to work propaganda 😭 that’s wild and Brian Niccol needs to fuck himself too

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

bro one dude called me a marxist Isis supporting terrorist because i said people have a right to unionize and that ive seen people saying ADL stands for apartheid defense league in 2026

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

The concept of a Marxist Islamic fundamentalist

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

inshallah we shall seize the means of production after we exclude women from schools

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Not how I said almost? In my experience, that term invariably gets used whenever there’s a discussion on labor protections, and especially in discussion on Union organizing. Overwhelmingly this term is used to discount the workers it refers to, and imply that their desire for good working conditions and fair compensation is unreasonable, or that Union’s aren’t ’for them’. (I’ll admit I’m relying on anecdote evidence but it’s literally a yik yak post)

upvote 0 downvote