Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
👺
US Politics 1w

troybolton12

 People who intervene with ice operations are the problem
comment

22
upvote -16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Yeah sure. The people who hid Anne Frank and her family were the problem, not the Gestapo who hunted them. That is what you sound like.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

How many times do you have to lose the same argument?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Okay are you ragebaiting or actually being serious because I am game to debate if you aren’t just fishing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I’m bouta start intervening

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

This is a bad faith argument. The public should obviously not intervene with law enforcement officers discharging their duty. You noting that the interference with ice operations is “the problem” is disingenuous after seeing a man be tackled to the ground, disarmed, and then executed. Interference is clearly not the problem since they disarmed him and could have just arrested him. People intervening with law enforcement is “a” problem, but “the” problem is an agent executing a defenseless man.

upvote 1 downvote
👺
Anonymous 1w

If there were thousands of people intervening with police operations everyday people would get shot by police all the time

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

Well seeing as they’re not deputized police…

upvote 4 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

this doesn't dispute my point

upvote -2 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I haven't lost once yet so idk

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

I guess technically if you just quit responding you can’t lose, but let’s be real, you lose every argument you start

upvote 19 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I'm serious

upvote -2 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I got shit to do and like 10 conversations going at once my bad if i lose track

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

Can’t stick around to put losing arguments in every thread, amirite?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

are you talking about protests, people recording, or violent interference intervention could mean ANYTHING without a concrete defintion

upvote 1 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Any intervention

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

That infringes upon the first amendment. Do you believe in the elimination of the constitution?

upvote 0 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Yall are funny if i stay and argue to long you same im a depressed loser but when i leave you say im just losing so what's the right thing to do. Listen we both know even if i made the greatest argument anyone has ever made it won't change your mind so it's unimportant to me at this point having the exact same debatws

upvote -2 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

No it doesn't you have the right to protest yes. Not the right to get into federal agents way. That's never been something you can do.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

You just said “any intervention”. Protesting is intervention.

upvote 0 downvote
👺
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I meant intervention as in impeding on their work my bad for not being more clear

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> troybolton12 1w

No you’re good. Just clarifying for the sake of the debate. Could you clarify what you consider to be impeding in their work?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Two things can be true. The public shouldn’t interfere w law enforcement and Alex pretti shouldn’t have been killed. Noting the interference as your primary area of concern is outrageous given that you’ve likely seen the video of how he was shot. I expect the public not to interfere w lawful operations, and I also expect law enforcement to act professionally, de-escalate situations with protestors, and not shoot unarmed protestors who are surrounded by agents.

upvote 1 downvote