Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
This kind of banter makes me worry that he’s not taking this little excursion seriously
link

Trump says US may hit Iran’s Kharg Island again ‘just for fun’

www.aljazeera.com

upvote 51 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Can Iran get trump just for fun?

upvote 32 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

my conspiracy is that they are being drugged by people in actual power and their js the figure heads and joe was the initial experiment

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Al Jazeera 😭 🥀

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

More reliable than most western media

upvote 31 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w
post
upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Al Jazeera slander is wild work.

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

It’s on the same level as OAN

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Not even close OAN is just blatant propaganda

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Yes exactly

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

This graph does have issues but look where Al Jeezera is located. I fear your hatred for Al Jeezera stems from a place of hate to specific groups of people.

post
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

This graph has OAN at “analysis” and above MSNBC I’m crying

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

As I said it has issues😭

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Apparently not believing Qatari government propaganda = Islamophobia now RIP

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

AJ English is decent but you need to be mindful of what motives the Qatari government may have in representing certain things a certain way. Their coverage in Gaza has been way better than others because they actually have journalists on the ground there, but always see if it’s corroborated by another source. I’ve seen AJ Arabic and I think that might be a different story. They seem a bit more biased

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Also this can be fact checked in like 2 secs lmao

post
upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Yes they have very strong biases. It doesn’t matter if they’re on the ground there if they don’t factually report on what they’re seeing through an unbiased lens… which they aren’t

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Idrk how reliable these fact check websites are, but this doesn’t surprise me

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Seems accurate. I recently remember them claiming that thermobaric bombs were used in Gaza, but the bombs they were mentioning weren’t thermobaric. Nonetheless, the explosive used lowkey has a similar effect if you’re really close by, but it does it through blast waves instead of heat

upvote 4 downvote