Anonymous #2 4w

No but unless they’ve like, committed acts of terrorism we shouldn’t just assume they’re terrorists.

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Not letting in people who have committed acts of terrorism would be a restriction on immigration btw

1

Anonymous #1 4w

But you said no restrictions on immigration

1

Anonymous #2 4w

I didn’t say that silly, does my name say OP? Classic conservatard moment.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Please read before you downvote me into oblivion. Nazis, yes. terrorists. No. I believe you can have hateful beliefs as long as you don’t inflict harm. Think your racist thoughts all you want, don’t hurt other people. But if your sole intention is to inflict harm to push your agenda(terrorists) then no you aren’t welcome.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

Why are you speaking for someone else? Are you upset over nothing? Classic libtard moment.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

Now you would have to define what harm means, what it means to “inflict harm”. Generally, anyone who is making policies will be inflicting their agenda. The question then becomes which ones are harmful and which ones are not, which can lead to arguments about ethics and morality.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

I’m not speaking for anyone else dork. You just can’t tell who’s talking lmao

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Also, just copying what I said to you? Weak. Try harder cmon man ik you can do better than that.

1

Anonymous #1 3w

Is it wrong to expect that if you are replying to a specific person to assume that the response will be from that specific person, or is it really your need to intervene for someone else? which is no surprise considering I’ve seen that from you lot long enough to say my mock of you is at least halfway correct.

1

Anonymous #2 3w

Making an issue of something minuscule is a bait thing to do

1