
No, I described a fascist. The only part I left out was state coordination of private capital into the hands of politically-aligned members of the favored demographics. Many racism-based movements fail to meet the description above, but no fascist movement diverges from this basic model because that’s what the word means. The main parts that change is who the favored and scapegoat groups are.
How do you suggest fascism be defined if NOT by the minimum attributes necessary for it to qualify as fascism? That’s literally exactly how it works. Plants are much the same: the minimum attributes necessary to count as a plant go much further than just “it needs water” just like I was not able to stop at “white nationalism” to justify the label fascist.
do you not comprehend how white supremacy is systemic in this country, and indeed fascist? hence why there’s a difference between systemic-backed racism and individual prejudice. this nation has always been fascist, that is the point that most of you refuse to acknowledge; the mask has just fully came off now.