Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 4w

to build off your point, police officers are supposed to be judged by a standard of objective reasonableness (Graham v. Connor), not the officers mindset at the time, and this was an objectively unreasonable response. She was calm, the other officers at the scene antagonized the situation, she was turning away from the officers, and he only fired AFTER he was out of the way. That fails the objective reasonableness standard.

20

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 4w

Also I think he was pissed off because he was being taunted, so when he was bumped by the car trying to leave he was already emotionally charged, given his “fuckin bitch” line after firing

19

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 4w

yeah his excited utterance is a clear display of an actual hatred towards someone. this was not a reasonable response whatsoever and he should be fired and tried for at LEAST voluntary manslaughter.

16

Anonymous bama. 4w

Someone tried to correct me on this but I looked it up, officers are not allowed to fire at drivers unless they are 100% certain they are using the car as a weapon meant to cause them harm. Given the fact that people were yelling at her to drive, and his response to being bumped, neither of them were expecting contact which means I don’t think he thought she was using her car as a weapon. So yeah, clearly an unjustifiable response

17

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 4w

YES EXACTLY! Im in a argument with my mother right now about this whole situation, she believes that ICE was in the right and the girl was using her vehicle as a weapon, so her death was her own fault, like every source and video proves otherwise?!

9

Anonymous #4 4w

She didn’t? The car didn’t accelerate fast until after he killed her (because that’s what happens when you shoot the driver of a moving vehicle). She had been ordered to move her car by the other ICE officer and was complying, the shooter then ran in front of her car and was yelling contradictory (and unlawful) orders and also curse words at her.

4

Anonymous #5 4w

Did you even watch the video dude? He was standing in front and she gunned it.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

yeah so actually what happened, is he created what is called “officer created jeopardy” on the DOJ website, it actually prohibits you to stand in front of a moving vehicle, and also prohibits you from shooting at said moving vehicle

4

Anonymous #3 4w

I’m not saying that didn’t happen, I just don’t like that people are saying the officer is solely responsible for that woman death. Any person with more than 2 brain cells knows it’s not a good idea to try and ram an officer with a motor vehicle.

0

Anonymous #4 4w

Yeah so, even if he was rammed, dont u think he would of been knocked over? and on the ground? not standing upright and mobile and even leaning over the hood to shoot her?

6

Anonymous #4 4w

The issue is that it is an objective fact that she did not do that. Your entire premise is based on a lie.

0

Anonymous #5 4w

It’s not. Watch the videos man. I’d be careful throwing “fact” around.

0