Anonymous #3 1w

I don’t know ANY libs who still bother talking about communism. Most of us are social democrats and know better.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

The guy you quoted is talking about it

1

Anonymous #3 1w

I assumed they were a non-MAGA conservative

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Uh being a social fascist isn’t to be proud of. You can’t bandaid fix a fundamentally broken system.

3

Anonymous #4 1w

Communism has a goal of eventually abolishing the state. Many socialists believe in some degree of free market. There is a ton of nuance between different leftist ideologies regarding end goals, values placed on democracy, and methods.

2

Anonymous #4 1w

I’m assuming you’re using a derogatory term, not an actual one.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

“socialism allows private property, uses democratic processes, and distributes resources based on individual contribution, while communism seeks to abolish private property, relying on state-controlled, collective ownership and distribution based on need”

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Socialism doesn’t allow private property… nor does communism. You literally don’t know what you’re talking about. In a Marxist context private property means the means things like land, a factory, mineral rights etc. In a communist society you’d still own your toothbrush ffs. Socdems don’t repeat state department propaganda challenge: impossible.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s derogatory but also accurate, given that historically social democrats have sided with fascists against communists and communism. They are just the left wing of capitalism, not actual leftists.

1