Anonymous #2 20h

Abortion 👍 Vitamin K shot 👍 No Abortion 👎 No Vitamin K shot 👎

2

Anonymous OP 20h

True….

4

Anonymous OP 20h

Obviously that’s your opinion on each but that doesn’t explain why you feel that way.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

they won't be able to give you a coherent explanation because logically it won't make sense you can't come to that conclusion with logic, it's just the way they feel. hope this helps.

-2

Anonymous #2 16h

Because abortion removes something that relies on another person’s body while opting out of a shot that can harm an independent body. I genuinely don’t see a connection with the two.

6

Anonymous #5 16h

it's a baby dumbass, that's the connection. in what world is a baby independent? good lord i hope you never have a child just expect him to magically survive? he's still dependent on the mothers body. big dawg gotta eat.

-1

Anonymous #4 16h

If you got into a car crash with you and someone else, and you woke up in a hospital with a line connecting you and the other guy in the accident. The doctor says “if you remove this line between you transmitting your blood and nutrients, the other person will die. You cannot leave the hospital until they recover in a little under a year.” Is removing the line manslaughter? Generally, no. Because in an instance like that, your bodily autonomy comes before that persons ability to survive.

6

Anonymous #4 16h

Republicans are so stupid 🤦‍♂️

4

Anonymous #4 16h

Now imagine instead of another person with feelings and an identity and a life, it’s an unformed unthinking unborn fetus. Most abortions come early in pregnancy, meaning what they’re removing isn’t even a fully formed human by any standards. If you wanna argue that an abortion taking place when the baby could otherwise survive outside the mother is manslaughter. I might even agree with you. But that doesn’t happen like, ever. Because they can just like, remove the baby.

3

Anonymous #5 16h

Sorry I meant to reply to you not number four.

3

Anonymous #4 16h

First we should be able to have a conversation without you insulting me brother. Secondly in terms of independence I was referring to being removed from the body and living. A baby can be removed from a mother and live. A baby can breathe on its own, drink on its own (baby formula), but before birth it relies on nutrients from a specific person. Even if we provide a fetus with the rights of a citizen, what right says it has access to another person’s body against that person’s will?

4