This isn’t a matter of policy, most leftists are fine with bipartisanship. It’s a matter of rights being revoked and denotative fascism taking over through this cultish nationalism. Hell the German party they endorsed are pro eugenics and are self proclaimed Hitler supporters. You can’t get more “Nazi support Nazi” than that

1

Comment Deleted

0

Denotative fascism let alone just nationalism. Or are you arguing that the German Für party isn’t fascist, which is just an insult to their own ideals no matter how much I disagree with them. You’re defending a guy that made up a story about 9-11 about being carried out by some hot firemen lmfao. Anything to not admit you voted for a perverted man child I guess

1

Comment Deleted

0

No I meant denotative, as in he is depicting denotative fascism according to my definition. And on that topic he recently made up a story about being carried away from the debris by 2 firemen with 6 packs even though he wasn’t anywhere near the towers when they collapsed. Also right after the collapses he was quoted saying this too, he’s a snake

1

Comment Deleted

0

If you know what fascism is then why don’t you give us your own definition? Because plenty of experts both domestic and abroad agree he’s a fascist, you just saying “nu-uh” doesn’t really mean anything otherwise. He supports single party control, big government, is obsessed with national security, unity of religion and government, blatant corruption

1

Comment Deleted

0

I’m using multiple agreed upon definitions. And by your definition Trump is seeking a fascist state so I don’t know why you’re insisting otherwise? Also having to rely on semantics of “agreeable” detentions isn’t a good defense when it’s a well established source. Even your own definition isn’t exclusive to fascism and isn’t black or white. Fascism is and was a lot more than just Germans with mustaches

1

Comment Deleted

0

Corporatism isn’t exclusive to fascism or vice versa, at least not strictly like you make it out to be 😭 the only evidence experts site against him being fascist is them not believing he would overthrow democracy, he fits nearly every other requirement

1

Comment Deleted

0

So he is fascist excluding a component and the other best description for him his hyper nationalist, what a great guy still 😭

1

Comment Deleted

0

Well descriptions are an attempt to put a concrete label on what’s a very grey world, of course they won’t apply perfectly. But as long as we agree he’s nationalist/fascist adjacent then the premise of our ideals are the same and we’re just going to be arguing semantics

1