
lightpinkrosebud
we used to have this thing called investigative journalism where the press did more than simply regurgitate whatever lies the white house feeds themI really hate this stigma. So the only good new source is the ones paid by big corporate interests that obviously have an agenda? You don’t know these people’s backgrounds, do you? Many of the people I watch have political science degrees & other credentials. All because they’re independent and post to YouTube or patreon does not make them a bad journalist. I’d argue the ones that are working for the corporations are actually worse because they choose to work for people that can censor them
Journalists with a degree in journalism working with other journalists at institutions that have earned credibility over decades and centuries create higher quality work, yes. That credibility doesn’t just come from size, and it can be lost if they go against what got them there (just look at CBS and WaPo)
I understand what you mean, but in all honesty many careers do not require a degree. If these guys can gain a following and make money simply due to donations I’d think they’re still a great journalist. Anyways I prefer them over big media, big media has agendas and those credited journalists play a role in it