Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download

lightpinkrosebud

we used to have this thing called investigative journalism where the press did more than simply regurgitate whatever lies the white house feeds them
upvote 82 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Tf journalists are you reading? Plenty of people are publishing investigative journalism despite trumps attempts to censor them

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

This is a lie you’re regurgitating from the white house

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

We still have investigative journalism you just don’t know how to look for it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Literally when? We have never had that🩷

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

How would that work?

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

The concept of it still exists. It’s not being funded on the scale it used to. The Post broke watergate, look at them over the past year.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I think it’s more funded. It’s just not being funded by the top. There’s tons of good investigative journalists on social platforms that make a good amount of money from YouTube and patreon

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Well that’s not the same thing, is it? There are practices and structure to good journalism that’s taught at well respected programs. Those are very separate from randos on the internet.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I really hate this stigma. So the only good new source is the ones paid by big corporate interests that obviously have an agenda? You don’t know these people’s backgrounds, do you? Many of the people I watch have political science degrees & other credentials. All because they’re independent and post to YouTube or patreon does not make them a bad journalist. I’d argue the ones that are working for the corporations are actually worse because they choose to work for people that can censor them

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Journalists with a degree in journalism working with other journalists at institutions that have earned credibility over decades and centuries create higher quality work, yes. That credibility doesn’t just come from size, and it can be lost if they go against what got them there (just look at CBS and WaPo)

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Any outlet worth its salt does have a firewall between the business side and the journalism side, and when that erodes, they very much do lose their credibility.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I understand what you mean, but in all honesty many careers do not require a degree. If these guys can gain a following and make money simply due to donations I’d think they’re still a great journalist. Anyways I prefer them over big media, big media has agendas and those credited journalists play a role in it

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

And this type of take is exactly why our media environment is so unhealthy right now

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Quit projecting brother 😭

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Projecting what exactly?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Ur insulting me because of where I choose to get my media

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I’m not insulting you, I’m saying that a healthy media environment is built out of institutions that build their credibility.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s Watergate, Seymour Hersh’s My Lai exposure, the Pentagon Papers, the list goes on.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

I mean that journalists and the press have ALWAYS just regurgitated sh!t from the WH. Media has censored and hidden information so it would go along with what the administration was saying, this is 100% not new. obviously there are outliers

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

More projecting

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Genuinely what is that projecting?

upvote 6 downvote