
No need for the insults. The Jury did not rule on rape, in fact they explicitly rejected the rape allegation. Rather the final verdict was “liable for sexual abuse” but, as I noted earlier, the court is based in NYC which would make the Jury left leaning (bias against Trump). Which matters greatly when the allegations are almost entirely supported by verbal testimony. (A weak form of evidence). I think your politics are interfering with your ability to look at this case logically.
Convicted 34 times for falsifying business records by a New York court… “Civilly liable for rape” is a phrase that’s false and misleading. He’s never been charged for rape but for far lesser allegations by, again, a liberal court. Too my knowledge all evidence of this is verbal testimony, Trump has repeatedly denied claiming this is a defamation attempt. Still true to my original reply that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence that has not been provided or proved.
“Trump has repeatedly denied” idc what trump has said. the Judge RULED that he was liable for rape against E Jean Carrol. There is no accusations when the fucking court case has already been finalized and the verdict stood as “trump raped her” you’re a trump dick suckler and you need to hop off his meat. You’re supporting a rapist and it’s embarrassing