Anonymous #1 11w

especially automatic high capacity assault weapons. even if we had violent revolt where people needed to use them to subdue the government, do people really think a Ak-47 or larger guns is enough? to fight military or government weapons? idk, seems all a bit shoddy to me.

5

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #2 11w

the best home defense is having a dog, more than person living in your home, security systems, and not living a dangerous lifestyle. if you’re gonna get a gun, a pistol makes sense, but at the same time, most people are not remotely living in a area where they need to protect themselves like that. your partner is correct! why would you want a flesh harvester when you really need something quick and simple, idk, but I’d rather just live without them, not everyone has that choice, but most do

6

i believe it is. Is it the best reason to ban or introduce gun control? Yes and no. We should ban guns like assault weapons that have no use unless you’re fighting war. No one should have a ak47

1

this statement is so damn annoying bc nobody has ever seriously suggested in a legislative session to completely ban firearms. there are only bans in certain businesses, public spaces, or federal buildings as a symptom of the lack of regulations. if everyone were federally required to take the training that Texas requires prior to taking home a firearm, we’d all be MUCH better off than having nothing but a background check required.

6

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

i’m speaking very specifically about the M16, AR15, AK47, SA58, and other heavy weapons with high firepower… which people use the excuse that they’re kept at home for defense when that’s not what they’re made for whatsoever and couldn’t even be used in that scenario effectively.

3

… i was more referring to like a Torchy’s Tacos disallowing firearms in their restaurant with a giant sign in the entryway. mind you, this is still Texas btw. same with schools and playgrounds. if we could trust that every person with a firearm holstered or concealed was fully capable of using it, i think more people would be accepting of having them more places.

6

Comment Deleted

0

you’re exhausting. congratulations. you’re probably only a few months away from knowing someone that was subjected to gun violence in this country, if not already have. it’s 1 out of 5 people that has a loved one affected by gun violence. for me, it was Tree of Life Synagogue… then it was Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School (my partner was down the street), and days later it was my own university… i can still hear the helicopters.

6

Comment Deleted

0

bc the risk that you will use it to commit mass murder is too great. We cannot give everyone the benefit of the doubt. A pistol is just enough, and the likelihood of you using it to kill a large amount of people at once before being stopped is lower, most people who buy flesh harvesters are paranoid or a little bit unhinged. as we can’t make guns a political party thing, we should all be in agreement that at a certain point—it is overkill and ridiculous.

1

If gun control didn’t work, then other nations would have similar mass killings. But they don’t.

1

you must live a risky life in a risky area without any social welfare or security. Do you live in the Wild West?

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

well, a car has other uses. Duh

1

umm? not always? you see this is the problem, you’re not educated to have this conversation.

1

okay, that’s fucking ridiculous. You’re ridiculous, type of guy to say he’s safe with a weapon and next thing he’s holding it to your head.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

England. Italy. Australia. If you don’t know global history, you can’t make the assumption “America is just more dangerous” bc that’s not true. Japan. South Korea. All these places have crime, while lower than america, but not bc of their culture—bc of how they report crime, their social welfare and safety networks paid for by their taxes, etc.

1

If you need a AK47 to defend yourself from bears and wolfs, you’re just an idiot. Don’t be stupid when you live in nature. Again, if you put yourself at risk, that’s not a defense for a gun.

1

Comment Deleted

0

right bc grizzly bears are known to just eat bullets and hunt humans down for shits n giggles. You’ve never been outside have you?

5

Comment Deleted

0

omg bro, you’re finding reasons to be a psycho. If you regularly interact with violent grizzlies, imma say you deserve to be eaten. You sound like a fucking moron.

1

Comment Deleted

0

85% of all grizzlies on American soil are in Alaska. where would you possibly be that you’re hiking near grizzly territory, let alone by choice without any knowledge of the area’s ecology to recognize bear scat, trails, prints, feeds, etc. like you’re just making up some dream gun p*rn scenario that you’d need this weapon for… and why would you go leisurely do a day-hike a mountain with a 308 strapped?? that’s just telling me you’re fully expecting to use it on a federally protected species.

4

Comment Deleted

0

Don’t get close to grizzly bears and you won’t need a gun. Simple. Maybe one day karma will literally bite you in the ass. Hope the rangers won’t get hurt trying to recover what’s left of your remains in the mountains.

6

Comment Deleted

0

I know you need them to see your own dick when you’re jerking off outside your cousins window

1