Anonymous #2 15w

At this point most of them just disagree to disagree.

4

Anonymous #3 15w

Yeah because famously greed stops at the $1mil/year mark

1

Anonymous #5 15w

If people are motivated by greed wouldn’t you want an important job to pay more?

2

Anonymous blue__wave 15w

I didn’t say people are motivated by greed, I think if we want proper representation further separating the president from the plight of your average citizen is a terrible idea

7

Anonymous #5 15w

You know what happens when you don’t pay government reps well? Only rich people become government reps. Look up how much Nebraska pays their senators and all of them are pretty well off or old retire people which were also not supposed to like.

3

Anonymous blue__wave 15w

Right because not rich people have such an easy time getting into politics already

4

Anonymous #5 15w

$1m/year is what we call an example…

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #5 15w

The question is what makes it easier, obviously for separate reasons well off and well connected people have advantages in elections.

1

What does that even mean lol? What systemic reform am I against?

1

I’m calling for more things than just raising the presidents salary.

1

Comment Deleted

0

I explicitly call for that in the post you’re currently replying under so idk who you’re arguing with or what systemic change I’m against?

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Wow if only I said that in the post. Too bad I’m against systemic change or something bc of blue maga.

1

Comment Deleted

0

I didn’t mention it I said it should be illegal like you should arrest the president if they make trades that conflict with their office.

1

Comment Deleted

0

You’re acting like we’re disagreeing but then you just repeated what I said and called me blue maga lol. Just kinda dishonest unless if you didn’t read the entire post.

1

Comment Deleted

0

What systemic change do you think I’m against? That’s the part I’m not getting.

1

Ok so you’re just being dishonest you saw the post.

1

When did I ever say it’s isolated to only the president? Me not mentioning something doesn’t mean I don’t think it’s an issue.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

No you’re being dishonest by acting like I’m against other change bc I didn’t mention it in this specific post. Also if I only support change supported by democrats what big democrats are calling for the president to be paid more?

1

Comment Deleted

0

Again what systemic change am I against?

1

Lmao. Can’t believe you people can vote. Thank god not too many people agree. Term limits for Supreme Court Justices? Getting rid of electoral college? What a joke

0

Ive literally called for most of these things? Are these supposed to be the things I’m against? I can send you a previous post even if you don’t believe me.

1

Comment Deleted

0

I think the only thing you’ve mentioned that I would be against is a multi party proportional system. If that’s what you mean.

1

Comment Deleted

0

You keep implying I’m implying something by just talking about the presidency in the post. I literally mentioned state senators in the reply just above yours I obviously think this concept applies to more than just the president. I just think the constant trying to assume what my “evil” intentions are is annoying. Meanwhile you’re just listing off things I agree with while you call me blue maga.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Thank you I jump the gun a lot too it’s ok. I just prefer people respond to what I say instead of labeling me x thing then assuming what I’m for. I’m also pretty explicit with what labels I do identify with and I’m fine with people judging those.

1

It’s all cool I do the same I like to argue so I get it.

1