
discotheque
If evidence shows that an AI dispatcher IS more effective than the average human dispatcher would you support this?Have you not been paying any attention to how AI companies operate? They advertise themselves as a cheaper alternative to humans then proceed to charge as much as physically possible while cutting as many costs as physically possible, up to and including throttling computing resources dedicated to public services if they feel it’s not as profitable as other ventures
I don’t think you understand how this works, the end goal of each individual company is to control as much of the market as possible. They are not going to just sit there and leave an untapped market untapped, and as far as voters making that decision goes look no further than Flock to see how that argument doesn’t fly
Yes but if the demand of the police agency is met by the use of an open source LLM that is run on servers the municipality owns then Anthropic or OpenAI or whatever just won’t be able to compete. Also the LAPD literally did not renew their Flock contract BECAUSE of voter pushback.
Again, that all relies on the companies not actively lobbying the government to get contracts instead, which we all know is never going to happen And LAPD cancelling a contract because of public pushback still doesn’t negate the overwhelming majority of contracts that were implemented without voter input in the first place
The amazing part about lobbying is they don’t even have to get a specific politician elected! Instead they can lobby literally whoever is in office and get what they want whenever they want, regardless of which side is in charge! Lobbying is legal bribery and should be heavily regulated at a minimum
The government already has plenty of precedent for outsourcing AI to private companies, from Anthropic to OpenAI. It’s unlikely that they would do the job in house considering their past actions. Judging based on precedent rather than speculation, the conflict remains between the private vs public sectors.