Anonymous #1 4w

buddy is rejecting the evidence of his ears 😆

12

Anonymous #1 4w

If you watch the video he drops back from in front of the car into the shooting stance seen in the first perspective..

9

Anonymous #2 4w

So him trying to jump out of the way from being hit by a vehicle completely removes the reality that the car was going towards him?

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Per DOJ policy it means lethal force is not necessary.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Per common fucking sense AND DOJ policy, a vehicle IS DEADLY FORCE. This is the most BASIC concept in policing and threat assessment. It is why they make SUCH a big deal about these kinda cases/ situations, as a lot of people don’t comprehend the immense danger a 2 ton vehicle can do to a person standing there.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

DOJ policy specifically addresses this. You got a problem with it take it up with them.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

Also it’s immense damage a vehicle can do, not immense danger it can do.

3

Anonymous #2 4w

Ah yes, mischaracterizing the situation because YOU decided the vehicle isn’t a threat to bodily harm. That statute CLEARLY defines the situation of someone running. Just bc she turned her tire AFTER charging the officer, doesnt magically make it fleeing. She charged at an officer in a vehicle, THAT IS LETHAL FORCE. The officer responded. Hell I wish he didn’t, I think he overreacted personally, but LEGALLY he is in the right. She was also there INTENTIONALLY antagonizing them, escalating it

0

Anonymous #2 4w

Nice, at least you’re more competent than my auto correct, here’s a cookie 🍪

0

Anonymous #1 4w

The existence of a vehicle is not a threat of bodily harm. Also the video itself proves you’re full of bullshit. You want to argue in bad faith check Reddit. I’m not wasting my time on your uninformed or willingly ignorant bs.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

That's not autocorrect.. That’s pretty basic English bud.. There weren't any misspellings. You just misused the word.

6

Anonymous #2 4w

Ah yes, I present a nuanced take beyond “she was in car deserved to die boot lick yay” and you can’t fucking comprehend it and run away. The act of OBVIOUSLY impeding, antagonizing, and speeding toward an officer in ANY capacity is OBVIOUSLY a threat. In fantasy world the officer should have let her risk his life and done nothing. In the real world (in my opinion) he reacted too harshly. THAT IS RHE REALITY. But go play hero or whatever bs u think u got going on jacksss

0

Anonymous #2 4w

Right grammar police, can’t handle a simple complicated conversation, but u want to lecture me on linguistics over 2 words that are 90% the same thing, convey the same meaning, and could easily be misconstrued (BIG WORD OH NO) by autocorrect and lazy typing

0

Anonymous #1 4w

I gave you everything you needed and you through either malice or incompetence(my money is on this one) misrepresented it. Not gonna waste my oxygen on a waste of oxygen

3

Anonymous #1 4w

LMAO DAMAGE?! That's a big word to you? What are you? 5? No wonder your reading comprehension sucks

3

Anonymous #2 4w

Misrepresented it? So in the future I should just remove all nuance from my mind and follow exactly what u say? Hell I even addressed your misrepresentation of the statutes. I’m sure you TRULY believe she was fleeing, so u THINK you’re right. I believe she WAS charging him, before trying to flee. Once again, NUANCE MATTERS. See we could have a productive conversation on why this happened and our personal opinions on why / if he should have done it, but you can’t handle that! So go be a child!

0

Anonymous #2 4w

😭I obviously meant misconstrued you genius. Stupidity so good it’s nearing ragebait

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Basic reading comprehension, I’m not gonna baby your dumbass. If you can’t do it with what I’ve given you I’ve heard then a shortage of farmhand out there cause you aren't making it anywhere you need a braincell

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Aweee the whittle weetard is catching on

0

Anonymous #2 4w

ChatGPT ass response. U seem dumb enough that u would have let the car run u over

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Wow, baby figured it out and is trying to hit me with a zinger. It would be ChatGPT-esque. Not sure what an ass response is..

0

Anonymous #2 4w

Why u talking ab ass? Freaky ahhhh

0

Anonymous #1 4w

God it’s almost like you want me to keep going.. Please keep your masochism kink out of my political discussion.

1