Anonymous #1 11w

They argued in court that their opinion commentary was indeed an opinion and not to be taken as literal fact. The same excuse that MSNBC used for Rachel Maddow at one point to overcome the bar of “defamation”

-2

Anonymous OP 11w

The opinion was that they didn’t actually lose the election and so they were on the line for billions of dollars

9

Anonymous #1 11w

And you respect these mfs?

8

Anonymous #1 11w

Moving the goalposts huh

0

Anonymous OP 11w

So the legal standard that these organizations is that they are „entertainment“ not „news“. Got it. „You respect these mfs?“ was a follow up question, not moving the goalposts. Wee bit of projection there OP.

4

Anonymous #2 11w

I mean, if you can’t figure out if I respect them from my original post praising them, then you’re probably stupid. But yes they have separate branches, there’s Fox News, Fox Business, Fox Entertainment, some is opinion but they indeed have a branch dedicated to journalism. How else would they be able to acquire legitimate press passes? And why the fuck is a foreigner here? Americans don’t use quotes that way lmao

-2

Anonymous OP 11w

I was born in the USA my guy. I speak German in addition to English and sometimes leave the German keyboard on cuz it’s more convenient. Nothing wrong with me being bilingual unless you have a bone to pick with the first amendment. Fox journalism is a joke. The reason they still have their White House press passes is because they signed an agreement with the DOD (I will not call it the DoW) to only cover DOD approved information.

1

Anonymous #2 11w

They also endorse sports betting on their sports channel too. „Quality journalism“? Give me a break.

1

Anonymous #2 11w

Brother, Peter Doorcy was Fox News’s WH correspondent during Biden’s term and had an entire assigned seat there. Ed Henry and James Rosen were the WH correspondents during Obama. You are uninformed and clearly biased. No one is talking about sports betting, which is legal in many places btw. Sorry it offends your weird sensibilities.

0

Anonymous OP 11w

Imagine being below the age of 60 and respecting Fox News wtf

3

Anonymous OP 11w

„Biased“ because I don’t consider a so called news agency that was founded by Rupert Murdoch explicitly to launder right wing talking to be an actual news agency. Sure bud. Also the sports betting thing is absolutely relevant. Just because it is legal, it doesn’t make it moral. Active endorsement of it just provides further evidence that the organization is sleazy. But keep drinking the cool aid. Sure tastes like boots, don’t it.

1

Anonymous #2 11w

*right wing talking points

1

Anonymous #2 11w

“Drinking the koolaid” because I proved your ass wrong 💀 Let me guess you were all for CBS and their nonsense until Larry Ellison purchased it. Even though the day to day is ran by a liberal.

0

Anonymous OP 11w

You didn’t prove my ass wrong in any way. It’s objectively true that Murdoch funded the organization to create a media machine to push right wing talking points. Never really watched CBS except for the occasional 60 minutes piece that I would go and fact check myself. The program kinda fell off after Walter Cronkite left ngl. Also defining Bari Weiss as liberal is insane work and belies your own biases (which were already pretty obvious)

4

Anonymous #2 11w

So why should there be media that pushes left-wing talking points but not right-wing ones in a truly democratic society… Bari Weiss is liberal just not infected with the woke virus. Yall are going to lose when you keep railing on shit like gender ideology that loses most moderates

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

Holy shit, you really fell out the Overton window. I guess to you, diversity of opinion only really counts if it is right wing, otherwise it’s infected with a „mental parasite“ and therefore that opinion is invalid. Thought terminating cliches like that are a good way to stop questioning your own positions forever. Explains a lot in your case.

6

Anonymous #2 11w

In true leftist fashion, this word salad explains absolute nothing and definitely doesn’t address my point.

1

Anonymous OP 11w

In true modern MAGA fashion, you just ignore anything that makes you have to encounter political philosophy or recon with the consequences of your own positions. I addressed your point, you just didn’t care to listen. It’s almost as if you’re actively proving my statement on thought-terminating cliches in real time … 🤔

1

Anonymous #4 11w

Please for the love of god OP. Go find some objective sources. You are brainwashed. TDS isn’t real. People hate Trump because he’s an awful person

2