
The argument “no peaceful person would carry a pistol” is ridiculous. And so is calling Rittenhouse a hero. But people defend him and not Pretti because look at who the aggressor is. At the time of the shooting, Rittenhouse was trying to get away from the situation. The video objectively proves that, after he’s struck several times by protestors. That validates self defense. Pretti was by no means trapped there, he could have left at any time, and chose not to. It’s not comparable
One has to do with law enforcement the other has to do with protest vs anti protester. I don’t agree with the shooting. But a cop shooting you can be justified in so many ways by the department. Because of the brotherhood culture. And the police having a bit of authority on violence. It’s why this sucks so much. I would have stayed home if I was him. And voted in again in the next election.
I think you’re missing some important context though. Kyle Rittenhouse traveled like 45 minutes to an hour out of his way to an ongoing riot scene with a giant semi-automatic rifle. Pretti was a Minneapolis native with a concealed carry permit, and asserting that he was an “aggressor” for helping a woman up and maybe verbally confronting agents for shoving her while recording them is pretty questionable
I am well aware of that context. It’s exactly why I said “at the time of the shooting”. Ritt was absolutely trapped there by a mass of protestors, again as the video clearly shows. Should he have gone in the first place? Probably not. Pretti should have stayed home too. This idea that you’re going to effectively oppose any official police force in the streets without militant organization is naive. Anyone who tries should be ready to surrender their life if they refuse to deescalate.
I’m sorry, does confronting the police give them the right to execute you in the street? There isn’t any other method the officers could have taken to deescalate besides kill him? And you’re making it out like he went there with the intention of killing ICE agents on the basis that he carried a gun. The video shows he never even put his hand on it either. So could I not, by the same logic, conclude Kyle Rittenhouse went to the riots with the intention to kill?
You suggested he was “opposing an official police force” and that doing so “without militant organization” was “naive.” That kinda sounds like you’re saying he was going there with the plan of forcefully opposing the police. And if that’s not what you’re saying, then I don’t really understand what your overall point is to say that killing him was justified
Woah - I never said Pretti’s killing was justified. Remember, your initial argument was that these two cases are comparable. I disagree. Please stay focused, as you’re not arguing with the cartoon image of a Republican in your head, you’re arguing with an actual person. He absolutely was opposing an official police force, and clearly naive of how dangerously untrained ICE is to handle protest situations. Don’t fuck with them unless you accept the danger you’re putting yourself in.
Yep, right after the woman assaults the officer and is pushed to the ground, Pretti assaults the same officer just before being pepper sprayed. The concept that there were some monks simply passing through and they were “executed” is ridiculous. There are simply no peaceful protestors in the entire video
My initial point really has less to do with these being apples to apples comparisons than it does the way conservative media reacts to people bringing guns to protests and the expectation that someone can just kill you for doing that. In one case the guy that brings a huge gun that he acquired through a semi-loophole and actually killed people with it is a hero, in the other case he’s “looking for violence” for having a handgun which he has a permit to carry and never threatened to use
Protesting is certainly important, but how it’s done is important too. Screaming at some boot in an ICE jacket doesn’t have anything to do with social or legislative change. Let me ask you this. How do you think that woman feels? Does she feel proud for insulting one single guy in uniform? Or does she feel guilty for endangering the lives of the people around her? Do you think her actions were worth it?
Really? There’s no “mob mentality” in like 6 officers ganging up on one guy who confronted them and tried to help a woman up? There’s no “self righteous ignorant showmanship” in taking a gun away from a guy pinned to the ground and then emptying the whole magazine on him? Pathetic
How do protests work? Fascinating question. Non violent protests like the many being held across Europe to prevent further mass migration into their countries are very effective as they show a resolved public centered around a common perspective. Skirmishes with police are essentially meaningless. - unless someone is murdered into martyrism, then suddenly everyone cares. Though cold, this ICE agent just did the Dems a huge favor
If you watched the video, the woman blew a whistle at the agents. She didn’t assault them. They shoved her to the ground, and Alex went to help her up. Then they swarmed him, pushed him to the ground, beat him, disarmed him, and shot him. He was there exercising his first and second amendment rights, as everybody should. He was 100% innocent, as was the woman and all the other protestors present
So you’re against all forms of protest that aren’t 100% peaceful. In other words, you don’t understand how the world works. Protests are meant to scare those in power by demonstrating the power of the people. After a certain amount of time, peaceful protests become pointless when those in power couldn’t care less. Only immoral people who don’t understand history stand by and think that those who put themselves in danger to protect our freedoms deserve to die for it.
Not to mention that he was just there recording. And then he tried to protect a woman who was being assaulted. And he was murdered for it. Did you expect him to just step back and let them beat her up and kidnap her? That’s what a lesser person would do. Good people put themselves between overreaching power and the powerless. And you’re trying to make him out to be an idiot who got himself killed due to entirely his own fault.
The way you’re talking about it, you’re putting all the blame on the guy who was unjustly murdered in the street. He was there using his right to protest. All he did was help a woman up who they’d shoved to the ground. Stop trying to say it was his fault for being there, or he was being unintelligent, or any of that bs. He was speaking up for what’s right and helping another person. Blame the masked agents who shot him, and who likely won’t receive any substantial punishment. Their goal is to-
Honestly I’d be there with them. But if I weren’t, I’d tell them to do what they believe is right and not put themselves in danger unnecessarily. And if they made the choice to protect somebody else in that scenario? I would understand and forever respect that, because while difficult, if the scenario were exactly the same it’d be the right thing to do. And I’d like to think I’d do the same myself
Perry, if you had a family member call you and tell you they were at a protest and were actively confronting ICE agents, what would your advice to them be? Tell them they have a duty to protect the other protestors? Tell them to give ICE all the hell they can? Or would you tell them you understand why they’re upset, but suggest they leave to preserve their safety?
I stand by what I said to the first version of your question. They’re standing up for what they believe is right. If I weren’t there myself, I’d tell them to do what the can to stay out of harms way, but if the situation calls for it and they make a call to do the bare minimum and help a woman who was shoved to the ground? I’d say that’s the right call. I’d be upset, obviously. But I respect that choice and would do the same
I wanted to add the part about understanding their feelings because I really can understand why people are outraged by this. It’s the reaction that I disagree with. Thank you for clarifying. The fault here is that you are putting some topical policy over your own family. You are creating a situation that introduces so much trauma into the world. And for essentially nothing. I respect your courage, genuinely. But I think one day when you have children you will truly understand unconditional love
And that’s where the disconnect comes in. I don’t see it as putting a policy before family. I see it as them making their own choice to not only speak up for what they believe is right, but to go out of their way to help someone who needs it. What you seem to not be understanding is that the protestors are not creating this situation. It did not have to escalate, and certainly not as much as it did. What you’re doing is placing the blame on the victim who only wanted to exercise their rights-
It’s protestors’ fault that officers need to be masked. It’s protestors’ fault the officers couldn’t communicate effectively with each other. It’s protestors’ fault this guy felt he had to put himself in harms way. It’s protestors’ fault that local police weren’t present to help maintain order and do crowd control. It’s also these protestors’ fault that all of those undocumented migrants are there in the first place. You reap what you sow. It’s sad, but by no means surprising.
These ICE agents fucked up. Anyone who knows about escalation of force can see that they did not follow policy. ICE was never intended to do crowd control. The protestors put them in a position they are simply not equipped nor trained to handle. And go figure: it resulted in a tragedy. It will continue to result in tragedies. For absolutely nothing. I just don’t see the sense in that
considering the ice agents voluntarily went up to him your point again is moot. admit it youre too far deep. Idgaf who you root for ahat your administration is calling for will put us all in danger. imagine if the biden admin told covid protesters bringing guns to state capitals we’re enough for capital punishment. bc thats what they’re actively saying right now. not oh it was a sad case of poor mismanagement, but blatantly saying “you bring billboards to protest not guns”