Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
the scientifically correct and morally superior position: - fetuses are living ✅ - fetuses are human ✅ - fetuses are not people nor do/should they have personhood nor do/should they have the rights or protections of a person ✅ - bodily autonomy >>> ✅
If medical consensus was that a fetus is a human, would that change your stance on abortions?
#poll
Yes (pro to anti)
No (pro)
Yes (pro to even more pro)
No (anti)
Yes (anti to pro)
140 votes
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

Whether something should or should not have rights or protections of a person is not scientific

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

only the former really

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

What’s the criteria for determining which humans have personhood and which ones don’t?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

Murderer

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

opinion

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

personhood is philosophical and subjective. i should note that the "scientifically correct" part applies to the scientific claims, not the philosophical one's

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

hmm?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12w

Yea I figured that, I was just curious how u were using the term

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

gotcha

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 12w
post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 12w

the first two bullet points are scientifically correct. the last two are morally superior. i'd hoped people would be able to discern

upvote 1 downvote