
I want to be clear that I don’t support newsome or harris. Would that be marginally better than trump domestically, sure, but I dont think they’d change the status quo of our international relations. I think if we want to make the world, let alone our country, a better place, we need to start by caring about each other yk? “A society grows great when old folk plant trees whose shade they know they will never sit in” right? (Paraphrasing)
You do realize that Vance is just as guilty? Why is it so difficult for people to accept and acknowledge that they’ve been deceived? If you haven’t already, research the heritage foundation and its influences on government; as well as its goals and when it was founded, that should help you realize the game you’re a player in. Trump does not, nor does Vance or any other “MAGA” politician, give a fuck about your livelihood. They care about reinforcing the pillars of white supremacy.
It’s not denial. There’s no law that requires the president to share information with the VP, so the president often doesn’t. I don’t even think the two are that ideologically aligned. Vance is a much stronger populist, whereas Trump is operating not that much differently from an establishment Republican.
See, you could say that if he didn’t go on the news to defend every single action of Trumps, specifically the unconstitutional ones; or calling for more unconstitutional bs You’re lost, and you’re engaging in downright treasonous behavior. Your so-called “savior” is not a patriot, nor are the people around him enabling his bullshit. You’re calling yourselves patriots while demolishing the foundation of the nation. Im begging you, for all of our sakes, wake the fuck up before it’s too late.
You’re literally making up justifications, in order to delude yourself. He actively goes on the news to defend every single action of trumps; enough with this “distancing” bullshit in an attempt to garner favor for the 2nd fascist in office, for after fascist #1 kicks the bucket (which is likely pretty soon).
No, I don’t? Look, if you want a serious answer: we’re supposed to do some unprecedented. There is no “going back to normal”, the heritage foundation and the people behind trumps campaign, and the overall effort to revert civil rights and protections, showcased how flimsy the system we’ve been living under is in the first place. Honestly, imo it’s time for serious structural change to this country and the world, otherwise the billionaires funding this effort will just move on to fund the next
Civil rights? What civil rights? Name one civil right that he is taking away? Trump has actually done more than any president in the 21st century to protect civil rights for the average citizen. Not saying that excuses what he is doing with the files, but for every horrible thing he does, he does something at least somewhat good.
I’ll agree that we need structural change but what we really need is a true populist movement that acts as a forcing function to improve everyone’s lives, while also considering the ramifications of every decision to eliminate the possibility of enabling authoritarianism in the future.
The habeus corpus issue pertains to illegal immigrations, and It shouldn’t even be a right at all if you’re not a U.S. citizen. I can understand being upset about equal marriage, but you know what, that’s what happens when you use activism as a farce to violate people’s rights. Human rights violations begets human rights violations.
There is zero evidence he is going after legal U.S. citizens and deporting them. There are very few people with green cards that are actually getting deported, but regardless, they are not citizens, so technically he’s within his authority to deport them. You can disagree with it, and in fact I do too sometimes, but it’s not a matter of rights though. Non-citizens don’t have a right to be here. We allow them, but we technically don’t have to.
I’m not defending him, I’m defending a populist pro-sovereignty position. I somewhat support Trump’s position on this issue, but believe me I wish it was somebody else. I also think that the GOP has an issue with demonization when it comes to this issue. We should not be faulting illegal immigrants for coming here, but at the same time we cannot have millions of unvetted people crossing the border and staying here.
Those cases were all of children with non-citizen parents and isolated mistakes. Your claim that there have been hundreds is a flat out lie with no evidence. The fact that there have not been hundreds of mistakes is actually incredibly good. We’re talking about an error rate of <0.2%. That’s actually incredible
it’s actually true tho. there’s been hundreds of stories on the news, the people in cecot?? they determined only 8 of the 300 people they kidnapped and sent there were violent/potentially offenders. only 50% were thought to have committed any crime, and of that number, 75% of that was for immigration. you’re fucking ignorant.
You could say that about literally anywhere else in the world. Every land that exists was inhabited by different peoples at different points in time. You can argue that land doesn’t belong to anyone, and I’ll argue that sovereigntism is an absolutely necessary to prevent humanity from imploding in on itself. A healthy world has multiple governments operating simultaneously and separately. Unfettered migration erodes that.
That’s not our fault. You can criticize Bukele for that. There’s definitely a huge problem with what he’s turned El Salvador into, but at the same time he also liberated El Salvador from an illegitimate essentially fascist-like regime controlled by MS-13. But besides that, those people were clearly and obviously violent gang members, but they are ultimately not our responsibility because they are not US citizens.
The “cherry picked” data you disagree with is the most we have. And why it’s being talked about. SHOW ME HOW THEY CALCULATED THAT RATE OF ERROR, GENIUS! if they haven’t released any data, where tf do you think they got the rate of error? Their ass? Your ass maybe? The statistic you gave means absolutely nothing without the analysis I can say I have 100% success rate of making your mom cum, no data to disprove or prove so you just gotta accept it’s likely true