Anonymous #1 5w

I’m not even accusing him of any of that. It’s just like, the idea your self perception of being moral because you “don’t kill” would supersede the wellbeing of real living children is viscerally upsetting to me

8

It’s controversial because you’d permit bad things to happen to avoid harming your own perception of yourselfZ

5

And it’s clear you personally can’t see that, but it’s deeply gross

5

“Not everyone wants blood on their hands” Is the sentiment that drives you, and it’s more important to you than a child’s want to not be killed or raped. I don’t want blood on my hands either, not really. I can barely kill a chicken. But my want to feel moral and kind doesnt supersede a child’s want to live a full life or to not be raped

7

No because you’re complacent with nazism and raping children lol

6

Anonymous mushy.the.mushroom 5w

such an immoral and horrendous position to just remove yourself when you’re given the chance to stop a heinous act at the expense of other lives

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Yes.

6

Anonymous #1 5w

That’s immoral. Doing nothing when you could do something to stop a bad thing is immoral. It makes you a bad person. But not even in an active way, it’s like this cowardly pathetic kind of cruelty.

7

Anonymous #1 5w

You’re like the guy who went to Epsteins island and didn’t participate, but also did nothing to stop what they knew was going on. Maybe they never went back, but they never risked anything to help people they knew would be hurt either. you’d be that guy.

9