Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Party that claims to want to protect kids btw
This post is unavailable
upvote 11 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Okay and?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

We’re the first word champ of shooting kids, you’d think republicans would want to stop that if they’re fond of keeping kids alive and well 👍

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

The vast majority of shootings are not committed with these weapons. There are better ways to protect kids than infringing on people’s 2A.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

Many of the most heinous shootings were enabled by them. It’s also worth asking the question of why do we need them? They’re completely unnecessary for self defense and pretty obviously not useful for hunting. If we ban grenades on the grounds of them being useless for self defense and more dangerous than they are useful then why not ban assault weapons?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

The constitution speaks of a right to bear arms, not a right to own a tank or other military spec weapons

upvote 1 downvote