Anonymous #1 18h

what…?

-1

Anonymous #2 18h

What do you need me to clarify

5

Anonymous #1 18h

a couple things i think… 1) are you suggesting you will be voting for those things even though they’re a deal breaker? 2) what rights are you voting against (if you vote for the people who are NOT the rapist, felonious, seditious grifters)?

0

Anonymous #2 18h

No I'm suggesting that if the two major options both represent things I don't want in this country (rape, tyranny, sedition), I wouldn't vote. The right I'm referring to that the other side wouldn't have allowed me is the RTKBA

6

Anonymous #1 18h

… when has any side ever suggested that the 2nd amendment would be revoked… there’s literally only one side that is shredding and actively trying to destroy the constitutional rights and protections of Americans via executive orders and the illegitimately packed supreme court. like people are actively being raped & murdered in ICE detention and our democracy was literally at risk on 1/6/21 because Trump tried to submit fake electorates to steal the election… yet you’re only worried about guns.

1

Anonymous #1 18h

why in the world would you think voting AGAINST sedition, felonious actions, corruption beyond your comprehension, and credible evidence of rape & sex trafficking is… “out of spite” instead of out of PROTECTION AND RESCUE OF THE SOUL OF YOUR DAMN COUNTRY?!

5

Anonymous #2 18h

Kamala Harris had it in her campaign plan to ban all my guns, and that sorta goes against my right to keep them.

1

Anonymous #2 18h

Also I'm not "only worried about guns" but I'm also not so unconcerned with my rights that I'd vote against them

1

Anonymous #1 18h

yeah, the policy was reinstating the ban that expired in 2015 on assault weapons intended for war. that doesn’t mean your entire RTKBA for every single gun that Americans own… You literally gave our country away to be bought out and corrupted by seditious felons and rapists just so you can have fun at a gun range sometimes…

4

Anonymous #2 17h

I actually do want the entirety of my rights, sorry if that gets your panties in a bunch.

6

Anonymous #2 17h

Maybe next time you can tell your politicians I'd consider voting for their side if they switched up their takes?

4

Anonymous #2 17h

Also guns are weapons, what is assault gun even supposed to mean? A weapon that can assault someone? Spoiler alert, thats all of them.

6

Anonymous #1 17h

you literally voted against your rights by voting for Trump. he’s taken away voting rights recently. you lost your right to healthcare when he tripled everyone’s premiums. he’s violated the rights of thousands of Americans in ICE detention, including many who’ve been in there for months even though they are indeed a citizen. he’s literally destroying the rule of law bc he keeps breaking the law… you just have no idea how much of your rights you’ve lost under this administration.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

I didn't vote big guy, I knew that both sides would have oppressed me

5

Anonymous #1 17h

meaning you allowed Trump to win and oppress the entire fucking nation horrifically and destroyed the sanctity of our constitution. Congrats on being complicit in the end of our nation!

1

Anonymous #2 17h

Cry me a river, literally all your side had to do was not oppress people. The bar is in fucking hell and you're still asking me to lower it.

4

Anonymous #1 17h

this is insanity, you’ve gotta be a troll. the amount of oppression from this administration is fucking abhorrent & it’s doing absolutely nothing to help Americans.

0

Anonymous #2 17h

No shit, it's oppression?

5

Anonymous #2 17h

Why do you think I am opposed to voting for this?

3

Anonymous #1 17h

Because you don’t vote AGAINST it. You chose to let our country fall into this ruin bc you have this fallacy that both sides are equally bad, when that’s just not true whatsoever. Trump admin is creating actual concentration camps and destroying the rule of law and you chose to let it happen.. all because you didn’t like that a policy from 2015 had the *potential* to be legally reimplemented by Congress.

7

Anonymous #2 17h

Yeah, there was no one to vote against it with, we've been over this. You just wanted blue oppression to win over red oppression.

1

Anonymous #2 17h

Again, sorry if me wanting the entirety of my rights gets your panties in a twist.

1

Anonymous #1 17h

you didn’t get the entirety of your rights. you and everybody else in this country has LOST their rights and you don’t even realize it… i don’t give a fuck about blue vs. red, it’s this fucking evil ass corrupt bullshit against the entire sanctity of our democratic republic.

9

Anonymous #3 17h

let’s bring back tar & feathers so these politicians actually fucking do their jobs and get held accountable when they don’t.

5

Anonymous #2 17h

Bro thinks Trump is corrupt but Kamala isn't 😂 He thinks they aren't two wings of the same bird

1

Anonymous #1 15h

You and I both know how Trump is a million time more corrupt than Kamala… you’re insane. please stop coping and recognize the scenario that you allowed our country to fall into out of a false equivalency.

1

Anonymous #3 13h

yeah bro keep posting that on yik yak that'll do it!

0

Anonymous #2 13h

they're corrupt in different ways but one's not worse than the other. and yeah, dems wanna take away my guns. literally couldn't own what i own if i lived in a blue state. if you think democrats don't want to get rid of guns you're fucking tripping.

5

Anonymous #5 12h

dude i have lived in a blue state and people have plenty of guns. you think people aren’t shooting at ranges, target practice on acres of land, and hunting out in Wisconsin or Maine?? as long as you’re not a violent offender or have some egregious builds/modifiers, you should be good… i think someone convinced you to be scared about that.

-1

Anonymous #2 12h

the stock magazines i own are illegal in plenty of states. just regular mags from the factory.

4

Anonymous #5 12h

isn’t that an addition and modification of the weapon initial weapon, though? i’m not personally advocating for that but i think extended mags are probably best kept at ranges since… not a lot of good reason to have them otherwise besides maybe convenience in the hobby, but any responsible gun owner knows cutting corners can cost you that precious safety when it comes to firearm storage & handling in residential zones.

-1

Anonymous #2 12h

nope it's the regular mag it comes with when you buy the gun, i couldn't even use my gun in a blue state because the standard mag holds too many rounds and a little pussy mag wouldn't fit

3

Anonymous #2 12h

there's plenty of good reason to have loads of bullets

4

Anonymous #2 12h

how is using a standard magazine cutting corners? frankly we just disagree, we're never gonna agree, and it's insane to say dems don't wanna take away my guns. they do. they say it all the time.

6

Anonymous #5 11h

no, i was saying that about when you throw overarching safety considerations to the wind just because you personally want a dozen more bullets in a single mag while you’re target shooting for fun… when the consequences of that dismissal of those safety considerations are potential death for others (particularly children in this country). i’m down for you having guns and those mags, just with maybe a little inconvenience. that’s not taking them away, just more responsibility for all owners.

-1

Anonymous #2 11h

Standard mags (11+ capacity) are useful for a lot more than just target shooting for fun, practically every purpose made self defense gun has them

1

Anonymous #1 11h

man you’ve got horrific aim if you need a dozen bullets for self-defense, but i digress. i’d love to chat more about my personal proposals for gun legislation that every armed citizen i’ve spoken to has ultimately accepted as common sense. and they didn’t threaten shoot me once, so that’s how you know i’m legit about their gun rights lmao.

-1

Anonymous #2 11h

Also, when hunting it's not uncommon for one to carry a pistol with 11 or more rounds for close range wildlife defense, so to say it doesn't apply to hunting either would be inaccurate.

1

Anonymous #2 11h

I guess I have to ask, what lawful applications of firearms do standard capacity mags not have their place in? Why should the people who use them lawfully be punished both by having their property taken and by being disarmed of the same capacity for the actions of criminals? If you plan to allow such lawful use, how would one even figure out whether or not you are buying the plastic box with a spring in it for criminal or lawful use? How would you stop unlawful manufacture/possess of magazines?

1

Anonymous #5 11h

you’ll start seeing me everywhere from now on🫡

1

Anonymous #2 11h

i'm perfectly responsible with my firearms the magazine size dosent make it inherently more or less dangerous. you n owe you can just carry more mags right?

1

Anonymous #2 11h

and i never said anything about throwing safety away broski you're making shit up to argue with.

1

Anonymous #2 11h

lmfao idk who you're talking to but no i don't wanna hear what you think should be legal with guns. all guns should be legal.

1

Anonymous #2 11h

my pistol comes with 18 and 20 round mags only. that's it. all that fits. comes with them when you buy the gun. cannot use a whateber the fuck mini mag with that gun. legislating that would be taking away my gun.

1

Anonymous #2 11h

also if i'm using a gun for self defense, i want more than a dozen bullets. i want to turn the threat into a fine mist. i do not want them to live longer than 5 seconds

1