Anonymous #1 2w

"accepted gifts" lmfao as if this isn't the most corrupt administration in history

26

Anonymous #1 2w

So we can’t hold people accountable on both sides?

-4

Anonymous OP 2w

Except we're not holding people accountable on both sides. One side is getting away with any crime they want to commit.

15

Anonymous #2 2w

FBI/doj confirmed that it was a lab leak

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

No they didn't

10

Anonymous #1 2w

You’re really missing the point here. They tried covering information up, just like this admin is as well. Two things can be true at once

-4

Anonymous #3 2w

Wow, so deep bro

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

Just gonna leave that here bud

-4

Anonymous OP 2w

That's not "confirmed" especially when there's also evidence for other explanations

16

Anonymous #1 2w

Wow, we’re being extra stupid today aren’t we?

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

Like this literally came out during the Biden administration 😭 you calling them liars?

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

No I'm calling out your lack of reading comprehension. "Most likely" does not equal "confirmed"

13

Anonymous #1 2w

There may be other “evidence” but it’s not a strong as the lab leak. The Wuhan Institute of Virology studied coronaviruses. How else do you explain a coronavirus originating from wuhan? “Nope definitely wasn’t the biolab that specialized in studying those”

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

your own headline proves you wrong. one fbi guy saying its the “most likely” is not proof of anything lmao. especially when the consensus view of actual public health people is the wet market. if u actually look at the lab leak theory vs what we know about the early days of covid it makes no sense

24

Anonymous #2 2w

You people are rediculous 💀 why is this a politically polarizing thing to say it came from a lab? Does this hurt your politics in someway? The only reason you don’t want to admit it is (for some reason) you feel like this threatens your politics.

-4

Anonymous OP 2w

no i really couldnt care less and i hate china. i just follow compelling arguments from scientists and the argument of “oh well they were studying coronaviruses and a guy from the fbi said its true” is not a compelling argument for lab leak

13

Anonymous #2 2w

A department with far reaching investigative resources, contacts, and classified information > a scientists theory

-3

Anonymous #2 2w

So please explain how there’s just no possible way this virus leaked, from a lab, in wuhan, that specializes in studying coronaviruses?

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

yeah so the source is literally “im not gonna prove it in any concrete way but just trust me though” meanwhile the other side has compelling arguments about the structure of the virus, method of transmission, holes in the lab leak theory, scientific consensus, etc

15

Anonymous OP 2w

buddy you can’t even admit that there were mass graves in NYC for the bodies of those who died with COVID, yet you’re trying to argue the science behind the initial spread of a coronavirus as if we don’t have the SARS outbreak of 2002 to compare it to? you’re being VERY ultracrepidarian.

9

Anonymous OP 2w

i wont say anythings not possible 100%, but its highly improbable as found by the WHO. the actual genetic makeup of the virus is consistent with natural mutation rather than lab engineering

7

Anonymous #3 2w

Why is this so hard for you guys admit? Legit it seems like you feel threatened by this being true. I need to know why this is so hard for you to accept when the head of the FBI during the Biden administration is saying that is the most likely cause.

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

And nowhere during this chain did I make any mention of that? Why are you bringing something into the argument that has nothing to do w it?

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

ive laid out the most calm reasonable take on this lmao. it appears youre the one emotionally attached to the lab leak theory

12

Anonymous #2 2w

Cause I’m just amazed at how stubborn you guys can be when it comes to this. The only reason you don’t want to agree is because you think this is a “right leaning” opinion when it is just a factual take.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

nope, ive given you several reasons i believe in the natural spillover. you havent actually responded to a single one of them tho and seem very upset

8

Anonymous #2 2w

I’ve given you the simplest most explainable answer that our highest investigative authority agrees with. Lab. Wuhan. Studied the same virus.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

i would trust the world health organization over the fbi for the origins of a pandemic. but also youre just showing you cant make the actual argument or respond to the point that the actual genetic makeup of covid is not consistent with lab leak

9

Anonymous #2 2w

They have no way of knowing that. Who knows how many times it mutated before becoming widespread. After so many mutations of course it would appear to be “naturally occurring”.

-1

Anonymous #2 2w

And the WHO does not have the same investigative powers as the fbi. Your basing your entire argument off of one piece of evidence that is very easily disproved

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

it’s wild how arrogant you are considering your illiteracy.

8

Anonymous OP 2w

the FBI did not confirm your claim, nor did Christopher Wray. apparently you need a dictionary before continuing this conversation

11

Anonymous #4 2w

Yes, I’m the illiterate one, when you’re picking at straws saying “most likely doesn’t mean confirmed” 😭 stick your head in the sand further bud

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

It quite literally doesn’t. like I said, it looks like you need a dictionary before continuing this conversation.

3

Anonymous #4 2w

At the end of the day, I know I’m right and that you’re denying this because you think it’s a “republican” thing to agree with.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

how does it feel to be a victim of your own demise and making? at the end of the day, you’re delusional and actively delude yourself in the face of critical feedback; but go ahead and keep telling yourself whatever you need to hear Here’s that definition you’re avoiding btw: “probably”≠”definitely”

5

Anonymous #5 2w

Can’t copy+paste ss the name of the article

0

Anonymous #4 2w

Are you missing the “more likely than not”

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

So a lab leak is more likely than not to have occurred. This doesn’t disprove me in the slightest 😭

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

you’re still ignoring how “more likely than not” (which is synonymous with “probably”, you utter moron) is not the equivalent of “definitely” nor “confirmed” this is painful.

6

Anonymous #4 2w

Grasping at straws here once again. It’s still more likely than not😭 your whole argument is “you said confirmed but it’s actually more likely than not to be a lab leak” are you listening to yourself?

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10117112/

5

Anonymous OP 2w

it fundamentally disproved your incorrect claim of that hypothesis being “confirmed” you’re just too stupid to realize that, sorry not sorry.

5

Anonymous #4 2w

So it’s still more likely than not to have been a lab leak

-2

Anonymous #4 2w

Literally your only point against me is that I said confirmed when it’s still more likely than not to have occurred💀 it’s like trying to say someone’s wrong because they misspelled something

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

and anyone can make that claim without proof. hence the difference between probably and definitely. Christopher Wray knows that difference, which is why he specifically chose to say the phrase he did. it gives him plausible deniability while still allowing him to manipulate dumbasses like you.

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Bro can’t read or is braindead.

1

Anonymous #5 2w

All you need to do is ss the name, that’s it

0

Anonymous OP 2w

All you gotta do is type em in.

6

Anonymous #4 2w

Literally what reason would he have to lie about this?😭 it’s more damaging to cover up where it came from than to not

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

I could name a hundred reason as to why WHO would want to suppress the true origin, but not nearly enough as to why they would want to purposely lie about it originating from a lab

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

you can’t understand why the director of the FBI would lie about the origins of a global pandemic, especially when said lie is attempting to attach all responsibility to a country that we (the United States) are openly opposed to?

8

Anonymous #4 2w

you can’t comprehend the nationalism behind realigning all fault to China, as a nation, in order to avoid recognition of our own failures in preparation and implementation of pandemic response policies? Especially considering how many people needlessly died after the president minimized and downplayed the severity of said pandemic, delaying the implementation of necessary quarantine procedures until the absolute last minute?

8

Anonymous #4 2w

So I was right in my first assumption that you don’t want to agree with this because it’s a “republican” view point. Are you forgetting this was a Biden admin official that said this? Furthermore how does stating the origin of a virus have anything to do with our preparation?

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

like I said, deluding yourself. I won’t agree with you because you’re fundamentally wrong and manipulating both rhetoric and history. I don’t give a fuck whose presidency released this shit, especially when you can’t even understand what it means

7

Anonymous #4 2w

Like bro you just told on yourself. You dont want to beleive this because it threatens your politics (even though it doesnt)

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

you’re actually illiterate, aren’t you?

4

Anonymous #4 2w

You have yet to explain how just simply acknowledging where a virus came from somehow equates to trying to dodge the blame for poor response.

-1

Anonymous #4 2w

You’ve given me an opinion but it’s not factually based in anything.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

I literally provided the definition for you, which you still misrepresent as being synonymous with “confirmed” Your stupidity and arrogance is your own fault

5

Anonymous OP 2w

Because it’s not simply acknowledging where it came from, it’s redefining where and propagandizing it in the process.

5

Anonymous #4 2w

You’re the one with arrogance here man. You’re saying that simply acknowledging where a virus comes from is somehow this totalitarian ultra nationalist agenda when none of those things came true😭

0

Anonymous OP 2w

you’re truly dogshit at propaganda. do you need a picture of my last comment, since you’re still doing that “simply acknowledging” bullshit?

5

Anonymous #4 2w

There was zero propaganda attached to the statement. Did he say “well it came from china so we’re not at fault for our response” you’re applying emotion and opinion to a simple statement and saying things occured that didn’t😭 you’re dumb and your opinions are politically and emotionally motivated and not rooted in facts

0

Anonymous OP 2w

You. Are. Dogshit. At. Propaganda. you know you have to be literate at the least, if you want to do this disingenuous bullshit.

1

Anonymous #4 2w

There’s zero propaganda being spread here dude😭 you’re just basing your opinion on emotion and politics. Coincidentally what propaganda does to people.

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

The irony of you projecting that insecurity of yours is hilarious. do you need the definition once more, just to ignore it out of your own dogmatic belief?

2

Anonymous #4 2w

Hey man, you can keep being wrong but sure. I’m the one propagandizing here when all I did was say “maybe covid wasn’t what we thought it was”. That’s literally the opposite

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

that’s literally not what you have been saying, you disingenuous little fuck. there’s a reason why you’re getting extremely downvoted for your dogshit lies.

6

Anonymous #4 2w

Goddamn lil fella, is somebody mad that I don’t agree with them? Go crawl back in your hole

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

look in a mirror for once, and maybe open a book.

3

Anonymous #5 2w

Yes, acknowledging discrepancies in government narrative is indicative of not having a brain. Great observation

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

Christopher Wray, on Fox News isn’t indicative of a discrepancy more so than a cash grab. He was appointed by Donald Trump as well. Or you know the other agencies that have obviously gone with the substantiated claim of Natural Origin.

9

What a waste of data for you to say anything, ever.

4