Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
I think Gods existence is provable and as thus should be taught in public schools Not as a matter of state established religion but as a matter of fact
upvote -9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

There are certain things in nature we can’t explain yet, therefore, specific Bronze Age texts are all true

upvote 38 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

If his existence is provable then can you please prove it to us here

upvote 28 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Social Studies? It’s just not scientific to go over mythology.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

How is it provable

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w
post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I mean, philosophically yeah probably, but not scientifically provable

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I mean, there’s also a theory that explains that the Big Bang was caused by a big crunch

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Yeah I think teachers should teach the moral argument for God How would morals exist without an all-powerful God anyways

upvote -18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

This also excludes religions like Hinduism right that don’t have an all powerful God

upvote -10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Morals can come from something as simple as “I don’t like pain so I won’t do it to others”

upvote 25 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Well, you see, if we kill people en masse, our species goes extinct.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Pretty much every bit if morality we have can be explained by either “this will negatively impact our species as a whole” or “ew thats gross”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Why would we teach something that we cant prove is true as fact to children? God causing the big bang is just one of many theories that could be correct

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

“god is provable” and his argument is the worst apologetic for god lmao 💀

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Dawg Confucius made an entire civilization adopt family values centuries before Jesus was born be real

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Morality existed on this planet long before the Bible was written

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

How so? You also literally refuted your own argument in the next sentence. Are you a religious relativist or absolutist? If you’re a relativist, you’ve already explained why your own argument is bunk, and if you’re an absolutist, how is morality imposed onto people in cultures that don’t worship the same all-powerful god, yet have their own systems of morality anyway? Either way, the argument is fundamentally flawed.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 9w

Huh

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

If you don’t understand what I posted, you probably don’t understand enough relative theology to make a strong evidence-based or text-based claim that an all-powerful being exists in the first place (which was evidenced by your first argument).

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w
post
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

So wait, I have morals and I don’t believe in god, am I stupid?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 9w

No you can have morals you just can’t give a proper account for them

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 9w

It’s like how people had gravity but couldn’t explain them correctly

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

As I said before: I do not like pain. Thus, I find it immoral to inflict pain on others. I do not want to die. Thus, I find it immoral to inflict death on others. Do I need to go on?

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

So wait, are you saying that people say god is a thing when they’re actually referring to a common set of morals that people don’t have a conscious grasp of and need off terminology?

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

“I don’t like peanuts” “This I find it immoral to have other eat peanuts” Your argument just fails without God How does the “thus” follow from your preference at all!!!

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #11 9w

No

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Comparing a force that has no evidence backing it and you havent proven exists to forces that can be modeled and are proven to be consistently correct is definitely logically consistent

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

So if it was caused by a force such as gravity, does this mean grqvity is now considered god?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Gravity is ultimately caused by God Is it god? No. Is morality God? Yes God is the good

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

It’s caused by the warping of spacetime by mass but go off

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Prove that

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Well that’s caused by the gravitational force

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

In that case god just kinda becomes anything you want it to be. Like, if you define god as a really strong force that holds things together, i guess god exists, but its not very helpful as a definition

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

I mean God isn’t the strong force but he did cause it at least indirectly

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Prove it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

I can say that Zeus caused it and have the exact same amount of evidence you do

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Prove it

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

You said we can compare them to realities, which means we can prove them by comparing them to the real world. Therefore, you can create mathematical models and compare them to what we see in reality and see if they hold. You cant do that with the god you were talking about because it would be a single event that we cant recreate

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

God created everything look at the cosmological argument What created the strong force and what created that and etc until you get to God? God did it simple as that

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Exactly, gods aren’t real, glad you understand

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

And what created god

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 9w

Nothing he’s God

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

And why cant you use that same logic for every force in the universe?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

“Nothing created the universe, it’s the universe”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

“Something caused the local universe to form” does not get you to “created it” let alone get you to a god existing.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Except the universe existed before the big bang, so we actually dont know if it has a beginning or end. What we can measure is when the OBSERVABLE universe began, not the universe as a whole.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

They are actually absolutely meaningfully distinct, creation implies creator, but you are presupposing the universe is a creation. It is entirely possible (most likely actually) that the universe formed from natural forces and processes.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

Sinner

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

lol, good troll my man good troll

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I really don’t think people are worshipping natural processes and forces, that is genuinely not anyone’s conception of god

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I think using God is way too overloaded to use that term in public schools if you just mean some generic cause for the local universe That would like be harmful to education and all that would do is be Christian propaganda But instead I think God like one more similar to Christian God is provable so I mean yeah. Jesus saves sude

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Your definition of god can be literally anything. I think its pretty obvious the op of this post meant the christian god, but if youre saying that the big bang was caused by something, i agree with you lol

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I am aware of daoism, it is not common in the slightest in the United States, which we are in the politics channel for. Clearly I am talking about the conception of god among Americans, for which this conception is practically unheard of.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Dude I’m Christian and even I know this is a terrible argument. Non religious people have morals. Uncontacted tribes have moral codes. You don’t need God to have an understanding of right and wrong

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

This sentence is psychopathic in ways I’m sure you don’t even realize 😭😭😭😭

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

Brother mass causes the gravitational force not the other way around

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Fine, whatever, define god in the most vague and narrow terms, just further proof that science has killed your god so deeply you are forced to define him as natural forces and processes.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Cool, most people will laugh at you for calling that a god, atheist and religious person alike. Just be intellectually honest and don’t personify such a force with the word god.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

What would you call it?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #12 9w

I would call whatever natural force that resulted in the rapid expansion of the universe what it actually is, not “god”. 💀

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

It’s a personification to anyone with two brain cells in their skull

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 9w

What force would that be?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Most definitions of gods require intent and a mind. to 90% of people, calling natural forces and processes “god” is a clear example of personification

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Yeah, you’ve simply decided you are the arbiter of what words mean, and decided to ignore all the excellent reasons for you not to refer to natural processes with metaphysical language

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

“Spirit or being” lmao thanks for proving my point that was super nice of you

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Of course! My big toe is god, didn’t you know?

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #12 9w

We don’t know! Since we cannot observe prior to the big bang, it is very difficult for us to currently understand what results in the formation of local universes

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I mean, if you wanted me to continue arguing you can’t give away that you are a troll 😭🤣

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Fine! The wind is god, my penis is god, my quivering asshole and the shit that comes out of it is god! Yippie!!!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

You do though, I thought your god was whatever you feel like defining it? If he’s the wind why don’t you recognize the divine nature of my cock and balls?

upvote 6 downvote