US Politics on Sidechat | The juror who refused to give a not guilty verdict should be investigated and potentially charged

Join communities on Sidechat Download

The juror who refused to give a not guilty verdict should be investigated and potentially charged

13

-1

Anonymous 9w

do you know what justice means? you can’t coerce people to reach your desired outcome that’s genuinely dictatorship. you want dictatorship.

36

Anonymous 9w

Y’all have no idea how the criminal justice system works holy shit

21

Anonymous 9w

Do people not read posts before upvoting them? 💀

17

🎧

Anonymous 9w

No he shouldn’t, because that would open the door to all kinds of juror coercion. But it does mean that she needs a new trial.

12

Anonymous 9w

Me when I don’t believe in democracy

6

🦓

Anonymous 9w

post

5

Anonymous

#2 9w

It is not a crime to not reach the verdict you want. Jurors only ever get charged for intentionally lying under oath and that’s extremely rare.

26

Anonymous

landtrust 9w

OP is weird, but this is weirder💀 You’re actually sick asf

23

Anonymous

#2 9w

i think its bc the judge said that juror wasn’t following the rules. not that i think they should be charged, but

4

Anonymous

#6 9w

Yeah that means you declare a mistrial and redo the trial. Not that the juror goes to jail.

17

Anonymous

#2 9w

ik i am just explaining why OP might be thinking that way

3

Anonymous

#6 9w

I don’t believe the judge said that, I think it was just the defense attorney.

1

🎧

Anonymous

#3 9w

I mean it is landtrust

1