Anonymous #1 4d

So he stood there and witnessed it and did nothing about it. That’s not that much better.

93

Anonymous #2 4d

Still, let’s get the basic details right

24

Anonymous #1 4d

Agreed

20

Anonymous #1 4d

Do you have something to say beyond that or is it just "hIm WaS oNlY pReSeNt FoR tHe MuRdEr" no comment about him SA and impregnating the 13 year old?

39

Anonymous #3 4d

If I were to sit here and address every single accusation against Donald Trump, we’d be here a very long time

9

Anonymous #3 4d

Literally this. With full context, Trump raped and impregnated a 13 year old girl, then watched/had her baby thrown into Lake Michigan only for there to evidently not have been any investigation or follow up

44

Anonymous #1 4d

This is just the 13575323786th comment ive seen saying "he was just present" as if it minimizes his involvement while addressing absolutely nothing else mentioned.

22

Anonymous #3 4d

Not minimizing anything 😭

1

Anonymous #3 4d

Notice how you added the word “just” yourself

-5

Anonymous #3 4d

I get what you’re saying, but I seriously don’t think number one is trying to minimize anything and is against Trump’s actions as well

8

Anonymous #3 4d

Why would they comment on it everything else? They just wanted to clarify a detail

8

Anonymous #1 4d

It's a pattern I've noticed so I pointed it out. I could've said what you said verbatim but I put "just" which didn't change what you said...

1

Anonymous #3 4d

Actually it changes it a lot. The word “just” is a minimizing word, hence why I did not use it

-2

Anonymous #1 4d

Nope it's equivalent to "not that he did it" in this context. But nitpick if you'd like to deflect.. Again.

11

Anonymous #3 4d

Look dawg I get where you’re coming from but as someone who’s made the same mistake, yes that’s simple word does make a huge difference. Number one is not the bad guy here.

5

Anonymous #1 4d

Regardless of what else you decide to nitpick my point stands. There has been a pattern of people going "he was JUST present" in reaction to this piece of evidence. Simple.

1

Anonymous #2 4d

I'm not looking for a bad guy. I think that's where y'all misunderstood. I simply asked if there was any other reaction to that piece of evidence bc the same reactions have been about his presence in the murder.

2

Anonymous #1 4d

I hear you are saying lets get the basic details right, however I would argue that being an accomplice to something that heinous equals ownership of the crime. You don’t get to sexually assault a young woman, watch the baby get thrown in a lake, and then get off scotch free from a technicality because you weren’t the one that physically threw the baby in there. Trump did it and thats the basic detail.

11

Anonymous #2 4d

Last comment but I don't think the word "just" being used in thus context matters because (at the lake) he was "just" present per the victim's account. And I used just to sum up the comments I had seen overall. The word is only being focused on because it shifts the focus of the convo.

4

Anonymous #1 4d

We agree that witnessing murder and not doing anything about it is morally bad, right?

12

Anonymous #6 3d

Obviously

0

Anonymous #1 3d

This is also just a witness statement made in 2020, it doesn’t prove anything. I’m not supporting Trump but it’s important to understand what you’re reading!

1