US Politics on Sidechat | Hell of a thing, isn’t it. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

US Politics 3d

Hell of a thing, isn’t it. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

92 upvotes, 5 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Hell of a thing, isn’t it. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

Anonymous 3d

is this not the same day where massie and khanna both said six co conspirators, not just perpetrators, but co conspirators were deliberately redacted from the files

Anonymous 2d

Twenty years (2005 to 2025) is a long time to investigate someone, esp the six years after they died

Anonymous

#1 3d

Blanche gave in finally and revealed that Les Wexner was one of Epstein’s co-conspirators. Then Sultan Ahmed of The UAE was the man who sent Epstein a torture vid (where Epstein responded in an email “loved the torture video)

Anonymous

#1 2d

I think there are two co-conspirators and “several men who might be implicated”

Anonymous

#2 2d

Blanche only really gave in because those names were getting out either way. Members of Congress can access most of the unredacted files (supposed to be all, but some of the DOJ’s copies were redacted by the FBI) and make handwritten notes. They can then read any info including names into the congressional record and be protected by the speech and debate clause