Anonymous #1 7w

hardly lied to. he was very open about all of this. it wasn't until releasing the epstein files became half his campaign that he finally reeled in the constant expression of his attraction to minors

82

Anonymous #2 7w

Yea but you gotta understand unfortunately a lot of ppl in this country have been being fed bullshit their entire lives, and never received a proper education on top of that, they were literally ants that Trump was able to unite behind him. These ppl never had a chance. I like to think there is always room for growth but it definitely gets to a point where some people are just holding back humanity and contribute literally nothing positive to anyone or anything

33

Anonymous #1 7w

I’m not going to be sympathetic to any of them, I hope they continue to economically suffer until their lineages go extinct

7

Anonymous #3 7w

Billy badass over here

22

Anonymous #4 7w

Not at all, just truly have a lot of hate for anyone who supports/supported the current administration in any capacity

11

Anonymous #5 6w

hows that boot taste bro?

20

Anonymous #6 6w

I’m a leftist hoe. Just very funny when people play into stereotypes and then (people like you) lash out about it

11

Anonymous #5 6w

how tf was i supposed to know? acting like im a mind reader, only said that cause right wing always comment smth like that

26

Anonymous #6 6w

You’re supposed to know because you’re supposed to look at what I actually say and not what you make up in your head that I am

-13

Anonymous #5 6w

how dense are you, tell me from where in your post you directly say your leftist before you told me? im not the only one who thought this either, look at the downvotes.

7

Anonymous #5 6w

Leftists just have more to say man

12

Anonymous #6 6w

The only point where whether I was a leftist or not became relevant was when you decide to arbitrarily call me a bootlicker for making fun of a shitty meme. “The hive mind also ignores what people say when we think we hate their guts but may end up being wrong” is not a flex nor the validation you’re seeking

-4

Anonymous #8 6w

Nah he’s commented on his daughters body a lot bro. He literally said he can get away with looking at the girls changing because he was “inspecting them”

29

Anonymous #9 6w

he commented on her body yeah, so say that. Im not saying it's not fucked up but if u want people to believe you then u gotta say it how it is. and for the other thing he said backstage, not changing room. He did say people were "getting dressed" back stage though and then commented on their body

-14

Anonymous #3 6w

Thinking like this is literally why katniss shot coin and left snow to die in the hunger games, this ain’t it chief. Yes they suck and many people need to held accountable to the upmost degree, but we cannot become the fascists ourselves in the process.

11

Anonymous #8 6w

Yeah and that’s really fucking weird and rapey???

22

Anonymous #10 6w

it’s not fascism to not forgive people who support a pedo 😭

5

Anonymous #5 6w

bc leftists can actually read lmao

10

Anonymous #10 6w

*utmost also that's not fascism

0

Anonymous #5 6w

Well reading tends to be more difficult for those on the far right…

12

Anonymous #5 6w

which i explained already as to why i called you that, this is a political post your political standing was relevant BEFORE I ever commented. you literally dont seem to grasp that at that point in time i was the only one who explicitly told you what i thought of your comment, evb else indirectly told you if they liked it or not.

8

Anonymous #8 6w

What’s the definitive factor that makes “getting dressed” so much better than “changing.” Why did he distinctly say “you wouldn’t believe what I get away with” on the howard stern show in reference to this? Why wouldn’t trump submit his DNA in the E Jean Carol case? How are you still so convinced the man is innocent? I’m truly curious about it.

7

Anonymous #8 6w

idk why im getting downvoted. We on the same side. all intentions remain the same by trump but you want to change his wording which in turn makes us look like the liars and makes us lose debates. They will look for inconsistencies in arguments and im showing how to have none so you would win every time.

-3

Anonymous #3 6w

I didnt say he was innocent, I think hes guilty omfg stop warping my words

-3

Anonymous #8 6w

Because you’re a bootlicker. You’re policing people’s wording even though it’s not incorrect, you’re just nowhere near as good at debating as you think. You probably say things like “Yeah Kirk was the worst but he was super smart/a great debater” go suck a dick

5

Anonymous #10 6w

I agree, and he is probably insinuating that, but to say he directly said it is a straw man fallacy, and then your whole argument falls. I agree with you though, its weird asf and rapey

-8

Anonymous #3 6w

ad hominem x2 on yr part so how am I the bad debater? also we agree on the same shit but you are just worse at arguing for it bc you aren’t using facts. don’t know why I am getting attacked either 🤷‍♂️

-1

Anonymous #8 6w

Your argument is dumb.

4

Anonymous #14 6w

why

0

Anonymous #8 6w

This isn’t a debate, that was just the 3rd ad hom. The fact of the matter is the difference between “people changing” and “people undressing” is entirely semantical and proves your lack of intelligence. Go pick up a book you loser.

9

Anonymous #8 6w

“Stopped being his friend before most of ts started” you have zero evidence to make that claim.

1

Anonymous #3 6w

YOU said in YOUR response “debating” which is why I used the word debate 😭. Also, the words he used for what you are referring to is “…getting dressed and ready and everything else” which is different than undressing, and again you are quoting things that weren’t said actually said. BUT, what you should be focusing on (which would actually prove your point) is “‘Is everyone okay?’ You know they’re standing there with no clothes…”. This is an ACTUAL quote too, not something random I made up 🤷‍♂️. —

0

Anonymous #8 6w

— And then you insulting my intelligence and calling me a loser (x2 adhoms btw) is ironic because I am better at defending your own opinion than you are. If you hate him so much I don’t understand why you wouldn’t want to be able to argue against him better

0

Anonymous #14 6w

I stand corrected sorry. Epstein was banned from maralago mid/early 2000s and it was claimed that they did not have relations since 2004. Epstein’s horrific behaviors started prior to 2004 but continued after the fact aswell. But there is currently no publicly available evidence that says he has *ever* visited the island, and he has denied it on multiple occasions.

5

Anonymous #11 6w

“I want them to economically suffer until their lineages go extinct.” The Epstein class does need hard and swift punishment, however they are not the only Trump supporters, unfortunately a lot of regular Americans like him too. We are here because the South was not properly taken care of post Civil War and led to the the KKK, or the civil rights era which led to our modern white Christian nationalism.

1

Anonymous #11 6w

Abandoning an entire group of people in the US will only lead to more animosity and division in the future. These people are struggling financially and have continually been lied to by politicians on both sides for over a century. White supremacy feeds of desperation and fear, poverty. So no, I don’t actually want all of their lineages to suffer. I want them to get properly educated and taken care of so we can allllllll participate in society. I want better people, not more suffering.

1

Anonymous #2 6w

To actually hunt down and “get rid of” an entire group of people or ideology like that you would have to be an authoritarian at minimum to actually enforce that. Causing intentional continuous harm to an entire group of people based on politics is a facet of fascism. Effective punishment for genocidal behavior isn’t more genocidal behavior.

4

Anonymous #8 6w

Your argument is we should let a pedo/rapist run around because he didn’t explicitly state he’s a pedo/rapist? Also that man is a KNOWN liar.

3

Anonymous #8 6w

You cannot get dressed without being undressed no?

5

Anonymous #8 6w

So define the difference

0

Anonymous #3 6w

🤦‍♂️ geeg

0

Anonymous #2 6w

You look for something it’s not there, then maybe it doesn’t exist buddy

2

Anonymous #15 6w

They just haven’t released them; was pam bondi lying when she said they were on her desk?

1

Anonymous #3 6w

Keep deluding yourselves

0

Anonymous #15 6w

buddy they've released partial uploads of the various files and have fucked up hiding them so bad several times in such a way that exposed they were withholding additional files against the law

1

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

he lost his libel/slander case when people were calling him a rapist. the judge clarified that the penal code applied in his case requires penetration by penis for something to qualify as rape, but what he did is rape under all common understandings of the word. so even at best he is a sexual batterer, but at worst he is a rapist - which is an accurate statement that you can make legally

6

Anonymous #2 5w

Case was fake and lame af. And it wasn’t even criminal. And assigning people labels based on future laws they had no idea about because the culture of the U.S. changed is actually ridiculous. It’s just dumb. This is like saying doctors were evil because they were still figuring out how to do medicine best and gave people mercury. Like no. Those doctors were not evil people.

-3

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

buddy... it was rape regardless of the time. just like how a husband raping his wife was still rape even before it was broadly illegal to do so. it doesn't need to meet a given legal criteria. he's a rapist by definition and according to the judge. you are a rape apologist

3

Anonymous #2 5w

Rape is by definition a legal criteria. This is a fact. Don’t act unintelligent to try and prove your point. At that point you’re just spiteful. Just accept the L in this argument.

-4

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

do you think rape didn't exist prior to laws? fucking idiot. rape is rape. rape is not a fundamentally legal term by any means. it means having sex with somebody who doesn't consent. period. you are a rape apologist and your total lack of understanding of consent and what constitutes rapes is deeply concerning. your juvenile, flippant attitude only further proves that you are a rape apologist who doesn't give a flying fuck about victims or survivors. you are putrid and should be ashamed

9

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

genuinely the world will be a brighter, better place when people with your rapist mentality are no longer plaguing the face of this planet. interpret that how you will

3

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

When you’re at the pearly gates you’re going to have to explain to god that you repeatedly played devils advocate for Pedo Hitler 2.0 and he’s gonna drop your ass straight to hell. Good luck!

6

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 5w

Dumbest fucking comparison. Doctors weren’t getting their rocks off on giving people mercury. Rape is rape is rape no matter the legal definition at a given time. If at any point someone cannot consent (inebriation, age, power dynamics, etc) or revokes consent and the other party continues anyways it was rape. If you rape someone you are a rapist. If you do it to a minor you are pedo and a rapist.

1