Anonymous #2 2w

Has he admitted to the genocide? I don’t want an Israeli president I want an American one

4

Anonymous #5 2w

Harris lost because everyone hates Israel except for her, complete coward that pandered towards republicans and Israel. Not because she was a colored women lol.

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Maybe thats why she failed among college students and leftists, im talking abt the gen.pop. I couldve convinced my republican family to switch sides if she wasnt a POC woman… thats just my observation tho

6

Anonymous OP 2w

agreed, we elected a black man when most of us were learning to shit in the toilet instead of our pants. i think this time a candidate like aoc has time to rally support for popular anti-zionism and have an actual full-length campaign

1

Anonymous #5 2w

Bc my repub fam would love to vote for a pro-israel democrat, the trump spell is kind of breaking, EXCEPT that they thought she would make Michelle Obama VP and they couldnt handle the idea of two WOC in office, so they went deeper into the trump spell

1

Anonymous #5 2w

I would def support AOC i just dont think the gen.pop would switch sides for her

0

Anonymous #5 2w

Plus shes going to have so much “shes a socialist” libel against her campaign which the gen.pop HATES the socialism buzzword outside of urban areas

5

Anonymous OP 2w

I want a Kentuckian President 😈

1

Anonymous #2 2w

I want war with Ohio

5

Anonymous #5 2w

Not to mention, obama was a warmongerer and an establishment dem and a man, way easier to elect than a anti-war anti-zio WOC

1

Anonymous #5 2w

i think if she ends up with the democratic ticket she’ll be able to bypass a lot of the skepticism, a lot of people will just bite the bullet and vote D if they’re worried because they absolutely hate what trump and vance have been up to

1

Anonymous #1 2w

I hope ur right 🙏🙏🙏 shes def got my vote if shes on the ticket

6

Anonymous #5 2w

same! we’ll probably get cyborg joe though

6

Anonymous #1 2w

Imagine a Walz ticket rn 💀

6

Anonymous #5 2w

walz needs to retire to the upper peninsula and drink ipa’s until his time comes

7

Anonymous #2 2w

michigan already did that over the Toledo strip (1835-36)

6

Anonymous #1 2w

the UP doesn’t want him tainting their beautiful bigfoot country either tho

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Oh haha a joke candidate can we talk about a serious candidate now?

3

Anonymous #4 2w

Is Beshear not gonna just be another war mongerer Israeli sellout?

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Im curious if he takes AIPAC money

0

Anonymous #1 2w

I def agree that aoc might not have the audience to run. Is there any antiZionist moderate dem running?

0

Anonymous OP 2w

i doubt for president

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Yeah right, the dems clearly do not WANT to win atp 💀

1

Anonymous #5 2w

It’s actually crazy how popular a moderate anti Israel dem would be yet we don’t have a SINGLE candidate like that💀💀💀💀

4

Anonymous OP 2w

Look, as much as I don’t like it, there aren’t going to be many mainstream candidates who are openly critical of Israel. Bernie would have been great 10 years ago. I would love an AOC presidency but idk how successful her possible run would be. But you’re doubtful to have a good candidate, because they’re easy to attack. Bernie gets away with being critical of Israel because he is Jewish. The other candidates won’t have that.

9

Anonymous #7 2w

At this point I will just take someone who has good domestic policies and isn’t one of those right wing evangelicals who supports West Bank annexation. It’s the best we can hope for imo.

8

Anonymous #3 2w

Does being in support of genocide influence your vote?

3

Anonymous #7 2w

Wait whatt there’s no way you actually believe that. The biggest city in America just voted in an anti Israel Muslim right? We should try to get a better candidate instead of rolling on our bellies and getting Kamala 2.0

4

Anonymous #8 1w

For the presidency I mean

1

Anonymous OP 1w

“Moderate” and “anti-Israel” are fundamentally different things atm

6

Anonymous OP 1w

There’s no indication that he will be

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Massie doesn’t think humans contribute to climate change and voted against disaster aid for every single state except his own. I appreciate him standing up to Trump but I’ll be damned if he even tries to run as a Dem for president 💀

12

Anonymous OP 1w

Not sure, but what I think he will be is better at appealing to the Rust Belt than Vance or Rubio

1

Anonymous #9 1w

yeah Massie’s only good issues are Epstein and war

3

Anonymous OP 1w

NYC and the entire US are two very different populations

11

Anonymous #4 1w

I feel like those are pretty big issues though, issues democrats don’t seem to stick up for. Our nation is in deep debt and it seems like he’s the only person who actually has principles he sticks by fiscally and otherwise. I disagree with him on a lot, but on important things like war, rule of law holding elites accountable, and basic honesty from our public servants I think he has one of if not the best record

1

Anonymous #8 1w

These are baseline expectations of our politicians. Otherwise, Massie is a hardline conservative. I’d take him over most Republicans, but not over any Dems

8

Anonymous #4 1w

Like I think we have just hit such a low point that those being on the right side of those two issues are enough for me. It shows I can actually trust the guy to be an honest actor and do what he thinks is best for Americans, even if I disagree with him on a lot. I don’t have that sense with other politicians, especially not newsom. Most democrats will just continue the status quo with our Epstein class elites and keep supporting Israel in anything. The best Democrat ik of on these issues is

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Senator Van Hollen and even he doesn’t go as far as Massie against Israeli corruption in our politics and questioning the “alliance” as a whole. He’s still pro Israel while anti-Netanyahu and genocide, which to be frank is a complete cop out bc Israeli society itself and the state broadly across parties supports genocide and Israeli expansion. It’s sad that the best Democrat is getting flanked by a Republican

1

Anonymous #8 1w

I understand that, but I’d still want a left-leaning person as president if at all possible. While I appreciate Massie’s courage in standing up to Trump, he is still very much a hardline conservative

4

Anonymous #4 1w

He’s a seriously consistent libertarian, I’ll give him that. But I disagree with him on a lot of things, and frankly, I’m fine with someone like Van Hollen or Beshear compared to someone who thinks the free market will keep coal mining debris out of the water

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Yeah I want that too, but I just don’t see any democrats with a spine or any real principles in the running tbh. I just want to live in a country where politicians actually serve the American people, not some foreign country, corporate overlords, or cultist lobbies. I will legit take an actually honest Republican if they’re the only ones to do that. It’s sad that our country has gotten to this point where the near minimum is seen as gold

1

Anonymous #9 1w

If it comes down to Van Hollen and Massie I’d go Van Hollen. Beshear is in bed with the Epstein class and supports Israel, so he’s no from me no matter what

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

Is there any evidence of his support for Israel? What ties does he have to Epstein?

1

Anonymous #9 1w

epstein class is just a euphemism for capitalist class

5

Anonymous #9 1w

aww h*ll nah lmao

5

Anonymous #1 1w

There might not be anyone more in bed with the capitalist class than a libertarian lmfaooooo

6

Anonymous #4 1w

(referring to voting against making lynching a hate crime)

9

Anonymous #9 1w

Beshear called for redactions in the Epstein files to "protect victims" when the victims themselves said they wanted a full release (it’s just a more deceitful way of protecting criminals while pretending to care). He literally hasn't called Israel's actions a genocide once, he supports banning boycotts of Israel, he signed into law the IHRA definition of antisemitism which allows colleges to kick you out for being anti Israel as being antisemitic, etc.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

I’m sorry, you’re saying the victims wanted everything revealed? Didn’t several victims just contact the DOJ because their identities were revealed?

1

Anonymous #9 1w

The types of redactions he called for were not just blocking out victim names, he supported the types of redactions we got which covered for the pdfiles and actually outed the victims. We still haven’t gotten all the files they’ve even admitted to having. And there were victims at Pam bondi’s hearing calling for a full release

0

Anonymous #8 1w

Do you have a link to what he said about the redactions he wanted? Because that’s a serious allegation While I appreciate the courage of those victims, they’re the ones that are fine with their identities being public. They do not speak for the ones that never wanted their names revealed. And they absolutely exist

1

Anonymous OP 1w

New York’s election was still much closer than it should have been for a city that progressive. And most of the USA is much less progressive than nyc

9

Anonymous #7 1w

Every time I bring this up I’m turned into the bad guy 😭

1