Anonymous #5 34w

Harris lost because everyone hates Israel except for her, complete coward that pandered towards republicans and Israel. Not because she was a colored women lol.

1

Anonymous OP 34w

Maybe thats why she failed among college students and leftists, im talking abt the gen.pop. I couldve convinced my republican family to switch sides if she wasnt a POC woman… thats just my observation tho

6

Anonymous #5 34w

Bc my repub fam would love to vote for a pro-israel democrat, the trump spell is kind of breaking, EXCEPT that they thought she would make Michelle Obama VP and they couldnt handle the idea of two WOC in office, so they went deeper into the trump spell

1

Anonymous #5 34w

I would def support AOC i just dont think the gen.pop would switch sides for her

0

Anonymous #5 34w

Plus shes going to have so much “shes a socialist” libel against her campaign which the gen.pop HATES the socialism buzzword outside of urban areas

5

Anonymous #5 34w

Not to mention, obama was a warmongerer and an establishment dem and a man, way easier to elect than a anti-war anti-zio WOC

1

Comment Deleted

0

I hope ur right 🙏🙏🙏 shes def got my vote if shes on the ticket

6

Comment Deleted

0

Imagine a Walz ticket rn 💀

6

Comment Deleted

0

the UP doesn’t want him tainting their beautiful bigfoot country either tho

1

Anonymous #4 34w

Is Beshear not gonna just be another war mongerer Israeli sellout?

0

Anonymous OP 34w

Im curious if he takes AIPAC money

0

I def agree that aoc might not have the audience to run. Is there any antiZionist moderate dem running?

0

Anonymous OP 34w

Yeah right, the dems clearly do not WANT to win atp 💀

1

Anonymous #5 34w

It’s actually crazy how popular a moderate anti Israel dem would be yet we don’t have a SINGLE candidate like that💀💀💀💀

4

Anonymous #3 34w

Does being in support of genocide influence your vote?

3

Anonymous #8 34w

For the presidency I mean

1

Anonymous OP 34w

“Moderate” and “anti-Israel” are fundamentally different things atm

6

Anonymous OP 34w

There’s no indication that he will be

1

Anonymous #8 34w

Massie doesn’t think humans contribute to climate change and voted against disaster aid for every single state except his own. I appreciate him standing up to Trump but I’ll be damned if he even tries to run as a Dem for president 💀

12

Anonymous OP 34w

Not sure, but what I think he will be is better at appealing to the Rust Belt than Vance or Rubio

1

Anonymous #9 34w

yeah Massie’s only good issues are Epstein and war

3

Anonymous #4 34w

I feel like those are pretty big issues though, issues democrats don’t seem to stick up for. Our nation is in deep debt and it seems like he’s the only person who actually has principles he sticks by fiscally and otherwise. I disagree with him on a lot, but on important things like war, rule of law holding elites accountable, and basic honesty from our public servants I think he has one of if not the best record

1

Anonymous #8 34w

These are baseline expectations of our politicians. Otherwise, Massie is a hardline conservative. I’d take him over most Republicans, but not over any Dems

8

Anonymous #4 34w

Like I think we have just hit such a low point that those being on the right side of those two issues are enough for me. It shows I can actually trust the guy to be an honest actor and do what he thinks is best for Americans, even if I disagree with him on a lot. I don’t have that sense with other politicians, especially not newsom. Most democrats will just continue the status quo with our Epstein class elites and keep supporting Israel in anything. The best Democrat ik of on these issues is

1

Anonymous #4 34w

Senator Van Hollen and even he doesn’t go as far as Massie against Israeli corruption in our politics and questioning the “alliance” as a whole. He’s still pro Israel while anti-Netanyahu and genocide, which to be frank is a complete cop out bc Israeli society itself and the state broadly across parties supports genocide and Israeli expansion. It’s sad that the best Democrat is getting flanked by a Republican

1

Anonymous #8 34w

I understand that, but I’d still want a left-leaning person as president if at all possible. While I appreciate Massie’s courage in standing up to Trump, he is still very much a hardline conservative

4

Anonymous #4 34w

He’s a seriously consistent libertarian, I’ll give him that. But I disagree with him on a lot of things, and frankly, I’m fine with someone like Van Hollen or Beshear compared to someone who thinks the free market will keep coal mining debris out of the water

1

Anonymous #4 34w

Yeah I want that too, but I just don’t see any democrats with a spine or any real principles in the running tbh. I just want to live in a country where politicians actually serve the American people, not some foreign country, corporate overlords, or cultist lobbies. I will legit take an actually honest Republican if they’re the only ones to do that. It’s sad that our country has gotten to this point where the near minimum is seen as gold

1

Anonymous #9 34w

If it comes down to Van Hollen and Massie I’d go Van Hollen. Beshear is in bed with the Epstein class and supports Israel, so he’s no from me no matter what

-1

Anonymous #8 34w

Is there any evidence of his support for Israel? What ties does he have to Epstein?

1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #9 34w

aww h*ll nah lmao

5

There might not be anyone more in bed with the capitalist class than a libertarian lmfaooooo

6

Anonymous #4 34w

(referring to voting against making lynching a hate crime)

9

Anonymous #9 34w

Beshear called for redactions in the Epstein files to "protect victims" when the victims themselves said they wanted a full release (it’s just a more deceitful way of protecting criminals while pretending to care). He literally hasn't called Israel's actions a genocide once, he supports banning boycotts of Israel, he signed into law the IHRA definition of antisemitism which allows colleges to kick you out for being anti Israel as being antisemitic, etc.

1

Anonymous #8 34w

I’m sorry, you’re saying the victims wanted everything revealed? Didn’t several victims just contact the DOJ because their identities were revealed?

1

Anonymous #9 34w

The types of redactions he called for were not just blocking out victim names, he supported the types of redactions we got which covered for the pdfiles and actually outed the victims. We still haven’t gotten all the files they’ve even admitted to having. And there were victims at Pam bondi’s hearing calling for a full release

0

Anonymous #8 34w

Do you have a link to what he said about the redactions he wanted? Because that’s a serious allegation While I appreciate the courage of those victims, they’re the ones that are fine with their identities being public. They do not speak for the ones that never wanted their names revealed. And they absolutely exist

1