Hawaii has a pretty weird but interesting way of tackling it. It’s a bit confusing but I’ll try my best! They made the argument that they’re not stripping corporate rights (CU was freedom of speech), but they’re limiting power (specifically the power to spend in elections). I think another effective tactic would be class actions as shareholders and making the claim that a corporation’s spending was against shareholder interest. That should make a point in their language

6

I pronounce it as feck

1