
Ok I see what you mean. That assumes detection is good enough and provides sufficient time. If it does, bailing isn’t terrible and can be a good option. If it doesn’t, the passengers are riddled with shrapnel at neck height. I think where we differ is in how much trust you put in EW or early warning systems to either prevent a drone from coming into range or give sufficient notice and high enough quality info to be able to actually utilize to the extent it can increase relative safety.
You also run the risk of armored vehicles just being giant spawling cans with drones. We aren’t going to make depleted uranium reactive armor for every troop movement. So it’s like… do I trust ISR is good enough to call out potential small arms threats before I find myself in range. Eh, soft yes. Would I rather my vehicle be off road capable to keep small arms threats at a distance to traverse around a non-permissive city/town. Definitely. If a drone swarm is coming, it’s coming from a distance.
With current optics… the ability to drive around a city like Qayarrah in an off road light skin vehicle, off any known route where they would normally place an IED, even if they had drones (ISIS just started with the “drops a grenade”) models. Would have been preferable to rolling armored straight through the town center every time we had to go to Mosul.