Anonymous #1 2w

well maybe not much r***, but definitely wars and violence

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

women already have lower rates of violence than men. testosterone is literally a hormone that causes aggression.

14

Anonymous #1 2w

like female leaders only engage in war to combat perceived weakness that was established by patriarchy. with the extinction of men patriarchy will follow, so there would be no perceived weakness of women. also, all of the biggest and deadliest wars and genocides in history were initiated by male leaders.

14

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

Keep that in mind when Woman-H*tler comes to power

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

why focus on hypotheticals when hitler was literally a male. the worst dictators ever were all male.

15

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

Yeah because most politicians were historically male so there is virtually no historical analog to it

2

Anonymous #1 2w

the fact that most politicians were male should tell you something…

11

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

If it’s the testosterone causing the aggression and violence, why aren’t trans men generally as violent at cis men? Bioessentialism completely ignores the aggressive culture that boys and men are socialized into

14

Anonymous #2 2w

What a nothingburger of a point

2

Anonymous #1 2w

Is it a nothingburger or does it require some additional thought? The problem isn’t testosterone, it’s toxic masculine culture

7

Anonymous #2 2w

it’s a mixture of environmental and biological factors neither of which can fully explain a man’s higher rate of aggression on its own. trans men do have less aggression than cis men but higher than cis women. gay men also have lower rates of violence than cis men, but higher than cis women despite being raised as male from birth.

6

Anonymous #1 2w

you must be an MRA

6

Anonymous #3 2w

um yes but how does this statement conflict with that??? you thought you ate

1

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

I’m just bringing it up because you said that and then never responded to the fact that, your thought was the least original thing on this platform

1

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

You must be delusional if you’re using a rare acronym for a common man

0

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

Historically speaking, with rare exceptions you are mostly correct

1

Anonymous #3 2w

most people on here are just liberal capitalists and you can tell just by their posts

-1

Anonymous justinian 2w

*men who are ethical

2

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

so what

1

Anonymous justinian 2w

I agree fully

1

Anonymous #1 2w

mra means men’s rights activists aka a useless group who claim men are somehow oppressed by the system THEY built

5

Anonymous justinian 2w

thank you, i wish more people knew that ofc outliers exist everywhere in any statistical analysis.

1

Anonymous justinian 2w

Exclusively because they were not granted the rights to do so, and if they become leaders with the same frequency the violence will be upheld by them. Think about Kamala Harris for example and how she 100% would’ve upheld the legacy of US destruction in the middle east, albeit not as bad as Trump

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

usually when female leaders are violent its because of factors related to the patriarchy

7

Anonymous scooby.doo 2w

Then I am not MRA

0

Anonymous justinian 2w

I’d literally rather join the taliban

-1

Anonymous #6 2w

??? 😭😭😭

3

Anonymous #6 2w

i’d join the taliban for fun

-1