Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
You are not against publicly executing unarmed individuals, you just don’t like the person that did it. Just look back to what you said on October 10th when it happened. You will either condemn or defend murder if it reinforces your political identity.
upvote -8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

bruh the right absolutely made a celebrity out of Rittenhouse for murdering two people… they were super glad about that public execution. shit, people on the right relentlessly even racist deplorable jokes about George Floyd’s death… yet they’re mad that they’re seeing similar things just flipped against them?

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

For the sake of your genes I really hope this is bait

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I am literally saying that your political bias should not be the factor in choosing what murderer to defend or condemn. I think Kyle rittenhouse is a deplorable loser who went out of his way for an excuse to kill people. He should be condemned. The ice agent murdered this man in cold blood. He should too. Im calling out both sides for being hypocritical

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Rittenhouse and Kirk were agitators with obviously bad intentions, Kirk died at the hands of one of the crazed gun lunatics he adamantly defended and worked to rile up. Pretti was murdered by the government while defending a woman from being pushed around by ice. If you can’t see the factual difference there and instead mistake that as partisan identity politics then you are the one being a hypocrite

upvote 2 downvote