Anonymous #2 6w

Sometimes but that's definitely not true for the current pedophile in office

19

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous OP 6w

Pedophile? Why are you calling him a pedophile? There's no evidence he's a pedophile.

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

literal thousands of implications in the files.

13

Anonymous #2 6w

and even if that’s the case, he’s still a convicted rapist.

18

Inflation

9

Anonymous #4 6w

He was never convicted of rape

-4

Anonymous #4 6w

Not thousands. There are a few things people said just hearsay and accusations

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

yes he was, the judge said this conviction is synonymous with rape, the only reason it wasn’t explicitly rape charges is because it was not penile penetration, but instead with his fingers.

20

Anonymous #2 6w

Over 38 thousand to be precise.

15

Anonymous #4 6w

It was a finding of fact in a civil defamation suit that he probably tried to finger e jean carroll in a dressing room decades ago

-3

Anonymous #4 6w

and that’s just the files released to the public.

13

Anonymous #4 6w

Rape is a crime and he was never accused of that crime, he was never on trial for that crime, he was never convicted of that crime

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

it was not a defamation suit, it was a sexual assault suit, and he was found guilty. The only reason it was civil is because the statute of limitations for the original crime had passed. it’s interesting how many lies you’re coming up with to defend the conviction of a rapist.

6

Anonymous #2 6w

he was convicted of sexual assault/abuse, which the judges that presided over the case explicitly said is synonymous with rape. NY has a very specific legal definition of rape requiring genital penetration, hence why his conviction was not explicitly rape, but his actions of penetrating her with his fingers is still rape, and the conviction of sexual assault still affirms that, as the judges even affirmed. you are fighting tooth and nail to defend a rapist.

8

Anonymous #4 6w

Well there were both but it was never a criminal offense we're talking about. We are talking about a civil suit between two individuals with a lower burden of proof

-2

Anonymous #2 6w

it does not matter if it was civil or criminal, a criminal charge was a legal impossibility due to the statute of limitations passing. He legally cannot be charged with any crime pertaining to that rape, aside from in civil court. at this rate, just admit you don’t give a flying fuck about rape nor its impacts.

6

Anonymous #2 6w

you’re willingly running the propaganda of choice for a convicted rapist, like it cannot get much worse than this.

6

Anonymous #2 6w

What does that mean you? Is that supposed to be redeeming?

2

Anonymous #4 6w

Most people would not consider fingering rape btw.

-2

Anonymous #2 6w

you’re an utter piece of shit. if the fingering was never consented to, it’s inherently rape you fucking scumbag.

8

Anonymous #2 6w

I can’t believe you even said that. who fucking raised you?

8

Anonymous #4 6w

He is a dishonorable person in many ways but he is not a convicted rapist

-3

Anonymous #2 6w

If someone randomly grabs you and starts fingering you, you wouldn’t consider that rape?

8

Anonymous #4 6w

You can make an argument for that but really only radical feminists see it that way. You accuse someone of rape and what comes to mind is not grabbing pussy

-2

Anonymous #2 6w

yes he fucking is, and you’re not slick, you deleted that comment really quick. yes, fingering can be rape if it is not consented to, why the fuck would you claim that it couldnt? And for the last time, this conviction is synonymous with rape as the judges have stated.

4

Anonymous #4 6w

The judge said as a personal opinion you know some people would consider this rape. That wasnt the actual outcome of the suit

-2

Anonymous #2 6w

This is just rage bait at this point talking about how only radical feminists consider finger someone rape lol.

5

Anonymous #4 6w

I would consider that sexual assault

-1

Anonymous #2 6w

I don’t give a fuck what rape is to you, that is not the legal definition, and you don’t even know what rape actually is. if someone came and started fingering you without your permission, and you didn’t like it yet they refused to stop, you wouldn’t have an issue with that? take a fucking step back and look in the mirror. you are fighting tooth and nail to defend a convicted rapist solely because of your political party. This is not normal behavior, and you need to seriously rethink this.

4

Anonymous #4 6w

That is the legal definition. I didn't say it's not an issue.

-2

Anonymous #2 6w

which is also considered rape in this instance. as I stated, the only reason he wasn’t hit with the explicit charge is due to New York’s specificity in the rape charge.

6

Anonymous #2 6w

either way, you acknowledge that Trump is a convicted sexual assaulter? Which is no different and no better than a convicted rapist.

7

Anonymous #2 6w

dipshit I gave you the outcome of the suit, being that Trump is a sexual assaulter. me calling him rape is just using common language. He’s a rapist, by the legal charge he is convicted under is sexual assault.

8

Anonymous #2 6w

He was found liable for sexual abuse. The reason he was held liable rather than found guilty was due to statutes of limitations, they could not criminally charge him on that bcs the limitations expired . The reason it was sexual abuse rather than rape was because of how New York State law classified rape at the time the crime was committed. It was defined as “penetration of the female member by the male member”.—-

5

Anonymous #2 6w

—However Trump used his finger which isn’t his member. However under modern New York State law the definition of rape now includes fingers. The judge states afterwords that Trump did indeed rape Carroll based on today’s definition.

5

Anonymous #2 6w

Forget about radical feminist, it’s what New York State law says now 😂

4

Comment Deleted

0

My understanding is we’re above the target inflation rate and employment has been slowing that’s why people are worried about “stagflation”

8

Also that wouldn’t be an “all time low” idk why you said that.

9

Anonymous #2 6w

He is literally a rapist you fucking lobotomite oh my god

6