Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 8w
Pro Trump people, please do justify this as “authorized and reasonable” use of force lol. Even the cops are all corporate sell outs 🙄 they did say no clapping, but they had 4 cops drag him out for clapping 6 total times
11 upvotes, 11 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Pro Trump people, please do justify this as “authorized and reasonable” use of force lol. Even the cops are all corporate sell outs 🙄 they did say no clapping, but they had 4 cops drag him out for clapping 6 total times"
comment

11
upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

“…several individuals in attendance were issued verbal warnings by the City Commission regarding disruptive conduct that was interrupting the proceedings. One individual, Lux Claridge, male, 37years of age, continued this behavior and was directed to leave the meeting. Claridge did not comply with law enforcement's efforts to remove him from the premises, requiring officers to physically carry him out of the meeting.”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Ah yes, 6 claps is seriously hindering the time schedule of the meeting and is obscenely rude to those in attendance. Only if you side with data centers lol. City councils aren’t listening to their constituents and you’re defending them lmao

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I quoted a police report. I added no opinion of my own.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

You quoted the report with the intent to defend it. Otherwise you wouldn’t have commented. So yes you submitted your opinions, at least in general. Any reading of the report and the situation shows that they were unrealistic in their reasonings for expectations in the meeting, especially considering that the board unanimously supported data centers against the OBVIOUS dissent in their population. This isn’t a “man interrupted meeting”, it’s a “council isn’t listening to their constituents”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

That’s a lot of things I didn’t say

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Then why did you even comment other than to refute what I said?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

To add context to an unclear social media post

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

Ah yes of course, then why didn’t you mention that the council board all unanimously agreed for data centers against their constituents wills? No, you supplied a single bit of reasoning from a source dedicated to defending itself and those council members only to not touch any other points and play the victim knowing how people would understand your comment. I never even originally said anything about you either lol, I’m not here to play these passive aggressive setup arguments lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I did not defend the police, nor did I defend the council’s decisions and discussion rules. The original post left out facts about the arrest and I simply added information about the police’s actions I believed relevant. Whether their actions were justified is something else entirely

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 8w

I didn’t mention more because I ran out of characters but thanks for swooping in and giving us this super important info 😅 I also did say that they didn’t allow clapping in the original post too, so this extra info is a little redundant beyond adding more to their justification when that’s just “he broke the rules but we don’t care why he intentionally did”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

No problem! Context is important and I’m glad to help man 👍

upvote 1 downvote