Anonymous onigiri. 19h

Yes of course but I don't feel bad for the people turning their lives and experiences into a political point

-4

Anonymous OP 19h

So you acknowledge the fact he’s a pedophile murderer and yet post shit like this?

6

Anonymous onigiri. 19h

I acknowledge the fact that some have alleged that

-3

Anonymous OP 19h

And then many mysteriously died afterward.

4

Anonymous OP 19h

Via shotgun to the face. Mysteriously.

5

Anonymous OP 19h

Do you ever wonder if hell is real?

4

Anonymous onigiri. 19h

Per bing that is the least painful way to commit suicide

-2

Anonymous OP 19h

Why would they commit suicide if they’re lying?

4

Anonymous OP 19h

Just for fun?

6

Anonymous onigiri. 19h

Could be nothing to do with the Trump case, could be that they're being silenced. The simple fact that they died isn't really enough to point me one way or the other

-2

Anonymous OP 18h

Are you gonna keep feigning ignorance even after it becomes impossible to deny? Or will you just be an out and proud pedophile by then?

5

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

OP doesn’t care abt CSA at all, and if it was more socially acceptable, would discuss how it’s not actually that bad

6

Anonymous #2 18h

I honestly fully agree with you.

4

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

No, if there's undeniable proof I'll agree but I just don't see suggestive proof as concrete

0

Anonymous #2 18h

Not true I think if he really did do it he should be put in a woodchipper feet first

0

Anonymous OP 18h

Friends with Epstein for a decade. Said explicitly he stopped being friends with Jeff when he poached an underage massage worker he hired. Jeffery Epstein said he was a pedophile before he was killed, while Trump was in office. He has hundreds of correlating accusations from known victims, many who were found mysteriously dead afterward.

5

Anonymous OP 18h

And there never will be undeniable proof for you. There could be a 4k video of Trump r@ping a kid and you would still post talk justify it. There’s nothing that would make you break from maga

5

Anonymous OP 18h

Not to mention Trump denying the files even exist?

6

Anonymous OP 18h

If he was honest about his time with Epstein, why would he pretend the files weren’t real?

3

Anonymous #2 18h

I'm not MAGA lol I would just rather them silence and oppress people who want to flagrantly violate the constitution as a political statement

-1

Anonymous OP 18h

You’re actively defending a pedophile, it doesn’t really matter if you identify as maga, that makes you maga.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

I'm not defending his pedophilia, read comment about woodchipper

1

Anonymous OP 18h

You mean the comment where you deny the obvious reality that he did it?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Point me to the denial then

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

I'm not aware of it

1

Anonymous OP 18h

That’s supposed to make me think you’re not defending him? “If Jeffery Epstein really did those things he should be crammed in a woodchipper. But your honor, he didn’t do those things.”

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Oh perfect my above comment explains why your woodchipper comment acts as a denial perfectly

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Didn't say that he didn't do it

1

Anonymous OP 18h

You said multiple times you’re unconvinced he did it.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

When?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Here

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Also don't conflate the idea of questioning your evidence with the idea that I couldn't possibly believe he did it

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Here

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Less directly here.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

None of those deny the possibility that he did, they just deny that your evidence is hard proof

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Oh okay. So do you believe Trump is a pedophile, then?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Might as well clear this up, simple yes or no.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Probably, I think thats like a requirement to be president these days

1

Anonymous OP 18h

So you’re defending someone publicly you believe is most likely a pedophile?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

No I'm defending his silencing and oppression of political dissidents where it supports the constitution

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Ok. So you’re defending the actions of a man you believe is most likely a pedophile and a murderer?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

You gotta take wins when they're handed to you in politics, even by a shitbag like a POTUS

1

Anonymous OP 18h

So yes, you are doing that?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

I'd love for us to do so under a better admin, but sure I'm supporting a modicum of his actions because they actually for once seem justified

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Yes or no

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Can you read? lol

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Yes, I’m just asking you to answer my question in a yes, or a no. To make it as clear as possible.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

So yes or no?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Well its not that simple of a question, I gave you my answer

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Actually yes it is that simple of a question. It was literally a yes or no question. And the answer you gave me for the record, was a yes. So why won’t you just say it simply?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Unfortunately for you, its not a black or white thing. I can both agree that pedophilia is bad and still think that silencing/oppressing people who want to subvert the constitution is good

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Okay. So, using your words. You’re supporting the actions of a politician you believe is most likely one of the most prevalent pedophile and murderer in American political history. And the actions you’re supporting is his choice to “oppress” his political enemies?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

That’s your opinion?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

*murderers

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

No I don't think he is the most prevalent, but yes I agree with the choice to silence some of his enemies (specifically the ones like OOP I was responding to)

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

I think freedom and justice are infinitely more valuable than any single person's opinion

1

Anonymous OP 18h

And you’re okay with this in spite of the fact Donald Trump has broken the law and constitution many times?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

No, I think he should be tried for treason for that, and tried for child sex crimes on the issues you bring up.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

But you’re still here. Defending his decision to “oppress his political enemies”. Despite the fact you think he’s guilty of the exact thing you’re saying he should attack people for simply expressing interest in? And also guilty of pedophilia and murder?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

I guess I go back to my question about hell

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Better the devil I know than the devil I don't

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Oh you’ll be with the devil alright.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

See you there!

1

Anonymous OP 18h

For what lmao

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Not supporting a pedophile?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Being against the oppression of a group for their speech?

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Nope. Supporting the subversion of hundreds of millions of human rights

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Pretty aggressive cope.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

You are literally saying this in defense of a guy who wants to burn the constitution down over having the other side of the aisle elected

1

Anonymous OP 18h

I’m saying this in defense for their right to free speech, which allows them to say that if they like.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Free speech isn't unlimited and doesn't protect terrorism

1

Anonymous OP 18h

For that I’ll go to hell? For that, I’m equally as evil as you, a man defending a pedophiles intention to infringe on the first amendment?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Saying you want to burn the constitution does not constitute terrorism.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

That’s just like, a fact.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

In my mind it does. It's harming society and millions of people in it to institute political change through fear. The very definition of terrorism

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Your mind has led you to supporting a pedophiles interest in infringing on the first amendment.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

So, not really trustworthy.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Ironically, you’re literally advocating to destroy the constitution yourself. You’re saying “we should get to oppress people for speech i am fully aware is protected under the first amendment.”

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Again, free speech is not unlimited and doesn't protect terrorism

1

Anonymous OP 18h

As you yourself have stated, this post does not fall under the legally defined definition of a threat of terrorism. Which is saying you personally plan to go out and do a mass killing.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Haven't stated that

1

Anonymous OP 18h

“In my mind”. As in you have a different interpretation of the law than the courts.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

And for the record, terrorism isn’t “a threat to harm society.” Like, you can’t say “I want to make everyone go to prison”, and have that constitute terrorism. Simply wanting bad things for people is just not terrorism.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

That is called an implication, and it's one that you misread. This also might fit the definition of terroristic threats under the official definition

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Bro if your broad definition of terrorism was legal, your own post would constitute a threat of terrorism.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

You’re in favor of the oppression of an entire political group for the actions of one person online, who was within their rights to free speech. If you disagree, call the police on them. But you won’t, because it isn’t terrorism.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

That's fine, I don't think trying to subvert the constitution for the specific reason of political gain should be protected speech

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

Also FBI report is in

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Show me.

1

Anonymous onigiri. 18h

How do I show you my beliefs?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Show me the fbi report dumbass

1

Anonymous OP 18h

?

1

Anonymous OP 18h

Why are you lying like that bro.

1

Anonymous OP 18h

That is pathetic.

1