Interesting trend here: white jurors are also more likely to find the white person guilty.
13
Anonymous5w
Whered you find that
10
Anonymous5w
This evidence doesn’t prove that they are not biased because there are too many flaws in it. However that doesn’t mean it is biased. That requires separate evidence and its own burden of proof. So for now I don’t know if it’s biased.
1
Anonymous#15w
"Diversity and Fairness in the Jury System"
-1
Anonymous5w
319 is a fucking miniscule N size go to high school statistics please
11
Anonymous5w
Very nice. Let’s see how many of the 319 are black people
1
Anonymous5w
It’s not an issue of sample size. It’s how the data were collected. That’s the important part
8
AnonymousOP5w
Authors?
13
AnonymousOP5w
Publication year?
11
AnonymousOP5w
I just searched that title in an academic database and nothing came up.
11
Anonymous5w
Wdym it’s in the post. It’s not. Unless part of the image is cut off for me
12
Anonymous5w
A picture isn’t a source. I can make a picture. A source would be where the picture came from lmao
15
Anonymous#25w
They think the graph itself is what a source is
14
Anonymousmushy.the.mushroom5w
Yeah. I and another user tracked this to its original source, and guess what was missing from that study. THIS GRAPH. My guess is they got it off an internet bullshit artist who decided to attribute fake graphs to real studies in attempt to promote racist goals.
16
Anonymous#25w
IGNORE THIS. Graph is not in the study it’s been attributed to and is probably fake. More fact checking coming once I put it in Google Image. I want to catch and expose this bullshit artisy
13
Anonymous#25w
I saw, and yeah my guess is the same.
Million of these get made a year, most misrepresent data, some don’t represent data at all. Appreciate you and your effort
10
Anonymousmushy.the.mushroom5w
The existence of people with so much hate and so little integrity that they would make a fake graph in attempt to make people turn racist… makes me want to throw up.
9
Anonymous#25w
Update: reverse image search found no reputable sources containing this graph. Searching times and dates for original bullshitter. Will post and shame.
4
Anonymous#25w
Earliest so far: Oct 29
8
Anonymous#25w
Nooooooo my computer diedddddd. Will be back
6
Anonymous#75w
Majority of studies either way on this topic seem to have a lot of flaws
1
Anonymous#75w
There was a 2007 study with that title, but I checked and it did not have this graph. The graph is most likely fabricated
1
Anonymous#25w
New earliest date: 5/10/2025
1
Anonymous#25w
3/24/25
1
Anonymous#25w
Update: I traced this back to another website that appears to have previously taken down a PDF of this 2007 report by Cheryl Thomas at the Ministry of Justice, UK. The other report that I found was much smaller than the March 24 substack claims the original one was.