Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Liberals: the court systems are biased against black people The court systems:
-8 upvote, 27 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Liberals: the court systems are biased against black people
The court systems:"
upvote -8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Source: trust me bro

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Interesting trend here: white jurors are also more likely to find the white person guilty.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Whered you find that

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

This evidence doesn’t prove that they are not biased because there are too many flaws in it. However that doesn’t mean it is biased. That requires separate evidence and its own burden of proof. So for now I don’t know if it’s biased.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

"Diversity and Fairness in the Jury System"

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

319 is a fucking miniscule N size go to high school statistics please

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Very nice. Let’s see how many of the 319 are black people

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

It’s not an issue of sample size. It’s how the data were collected. That’s the important part

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Authors?

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Publication year?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

I just searched that title in an academic database and nothing came up.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Wdym it’s in the post. It’s not. Unless part of the image is cut off for me

upvote 12 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

A picture isn’t a source. I can make a picture. A source would be where the picture came from lmao

upvote 15 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

They think the graph itself is what a source is

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> mushy.the.mushroom 5w

Yeah. I and another user tracked this to its original source, and guess what was missing from that study. THIS GRAPH. My guess is they got it off an internet bullshit artist who decided to attribute fake graphs to real studies in attempt to promote racist goals.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

IGNORE THIS. Graph is not in the study it’s been attributed to and is probably fake. More fact checking coming once I put it in Google Image. I want to catch and expose this bullshit artisy

upvote 13 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

I saw, and yeah my guess is the same. Million of these get made a year, most misrepresent data, some don’t represent data at all. Appreciate you and your effort

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> mushy.the.mushroom 5w

The existence of people with so much hate and so little integrity that they would make a fake graph in attempt to make people turn racist… makes me want to throw up.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Update: reverse image search found no reputable sources containing this graph. Searching times and dates for original bullshitter. Will post and shame.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Earliest so far: Oct 29

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Nooooooo my computer diedddddd. Will be back

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 5w

Majority of studies either way on this topic seem to have a lot of flaws

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 5w

There was a 2007 study with that title, but I checked and it did not have this graph. The graph is most likely fabricated

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

New earliest date: 5/10/2025

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

3/24/25

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

Update: I traced this back to another website that appears to have previously taken down a PDF of this 2007 report by Cheryl Thomas at the Ministry of Justice, UK. The other report that I found was much smaller than the March 24 substack claims the original one was.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

FOUND IT

upvote 1 downvote