Anonymous #1 2d

“Unlimited free abortions” do you even hear yourself? Lmao

35

Anonymous OP 2d

Yes, I do actually. And it is a thing, as I’m literally going in my last year of med school and have to see it daily 😘

-8

Anonymous OP 2d

Literally lol you cannot reason with people who think this is reality

15

Anonymous #1 2d

Holy shit if you were my doctor I’d be so fucking scared 💀

30

Anonymous #2 2d

You literally can’t reason with people that aren’t in the field and don’t see it everyday

-7

Anonymous #1 2d

God help us if med schools are letting people like you in

25

Anonymous #2 2d

This is actually insane, like I’m genuinely disturbed this person will be allowed to treat patients

20

Anonymous OP 2d

A majority of doctors vote red. Most doctors carry guns in the ER. Suck it up in face reality.

-7

Anonymous #2 2d

We’re a majority in medicine, we just know how to keep our mouths shut.

-6

Anonymous OP 2d

Your doctors most likely vote red too 💕

-7

Anonymous #1 2d

Well you aren’t doing a very good job of shutting your mouth, I’d suggest you start

23

Anonymous #1 2d

Highly educated people lean strongly left

21

Anonymous OP 2d

Nah, I’m good. No one’s going to do shit, and maybe if you guys knew how stupid you sounded, you could maybe learn something

-6

Anonymous #2 2d

Yes, if you want to talk PhDs in women’s study and race theory, if you want to talk professional degrees (MD, DVM, PA, NP, etc) it’s the opposite

-6

Anonymous #1 2d

I'm in bio science we all fucking hate republicans 😂

18

Anonymous #2 2d

Biology is the major that everyone and their second cousin is in if they don’t know what they want to do in science. A biology degree is literally useless, which you should also know Bio ≠ med school or any other professional program 🤣

-3

Anonymous #2 2d

Biology also means there are only male and female mammals, and men can’t get pregnant 🤯

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

You think we were made from dirt by an omnipotent being lmao shut the fuck up LMAO

9

Anonymous OP 2d

I never said I was Christian or religious, I just said I wasn’t a dumbass. Nice try with the whataboutism

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

Actually if you could read that was the entire point of the post

8

Anonymous OP 2d

And regardless you vote for morons who do believe that lmao

10

Anonymous OP 2d

Actually, the central idea of your post the way you wrote it was “facts don’t care about your feelings”. The rest was mindless word vomit

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

I teach premeds dumbass and have colleagues in medical research

13

Anonymous #1 2d

“Mindless word vomit” zero reading comprehension confirmed 🤭

8

Anonymous OP 2d

So people don’t have a right to their beliefs is what you’re saying? Also, you do realize just as you seem that you would vote for anyone against Trump, many people vote for anyone not a democrat 🤣

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

You have a right to your beliefs, doesn’t change that they are incorrect and doesn’t prevent me from laughing at you for them

18

Anonymous #2 2d

Teach, not are. Key distinction. Research is also not clinical practice, which you would know if you had any job actually in healthcare or higher education beyond undergrad level.

-4

Anonymous #1 2d

Yeah and everyone in bio/medicine hates republicans 😂

19

Anonymous OP 2d

Nah, it was just an unclear argument with no facts that is equivalent to a toddlers tantrum

-3

Anonymous #2 2d

Nah. We are republicans 🤣

-4

Anonymous #1 2d

I'm literally getting my PhD and work with scientists from around the world but whatever you say 😂😂

18

Anonymous #1 2d

this guy is talking like pre-med and pre-dental students were the stupidest fucking classmates in my genetics and cell biology courses lmfao bitching about how they just need to pass these basic 200-level classes which are bare minimum foundations to all the rest of their medical courses smfh 😅 also guess what, there’s articles researching pregnancy and birth in XY individuals whose SR-Y gene did not express. it’s cool as fuck!!! biology rules!!!

17

Anonymous #2 2d

You’re job is basically a glorified baby sitter teaching the ABCs to undergrads

-5

Anonymous #2 2d

Cool? Your PhD could literally be in basket weaving with the way courses are today so that means nothing 🤣🤣🤣

-5

Anonymous #1 2d

Someone's insecure and mad that smart people don't vote for republicans 😂😂

16

Anonymous #3 2d

That’s why it doesn’t matter until you’re in med/vet/dental school. Too many people think they’re going to be pre meds and fail/drop out/never get in. I never said they weren’t stupid, I’m saying the ones making it to professional school aren’t stupid.

-4

Anonymous #3 2d

Also, to clarify your comment about birth In XY humans with SR-Y gene dysfunction, it is only possible with hormone replacement, donor oocytes, and IVF/Embryo transfer. Not naturally occurring. So no man could get pregnant naturally ever.

-4

Anonymous #2 2d

Nah, they’re just insecure that they do 🤣 and I’m not letting so whiny PhD student that’s probably not even in a STEM field (my point being that having a PhD in let’s say African Art History is useless as shit) talk down to me.

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

Nah even doctors hate republicans

12

Anonymous #2 2d

We can’t hate them when we are them. Most nurses, PAs, and DVMs too.

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

Yeah the dumbass antivax nurses

20

Anonymous #2 2d

Nah. I’m talking the ER director concealed carrying, nurses with their cop husbands. People that know that the government doesn’t work for you, people abuse the system, and actually have to work for their money instead of relying on government handouts

-2

Anonymous #1 2d

Lying liar who’s lying

21

Anonymous #1 2d

We're in the middle of a weird party swap rn where the right is super pro heavy government intervention and the left is becoming the 'don't tread on me party'. So I'm curious. Are you now politically homeless, or do you still align yourself with the republicans/MAGA?

17

Anonymous #4 2d

Nothing I said is a lie and have screenshots/documents to prove it 🤣

-2

Anonymous #5 2d

First off, I’m going to correct you because Republicans ≠ MAGA. Secondly, by government intervention I am specifically referring to welfare/healthcare/border control. The left wants government intervention to give illegal immigrants legal status, and everyone welfare, Obamacare and other subsidies. That effectively is more government intervention, when the government is providing your food/housing/what car you have and heating your home (referring to electric only).

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

So you're just against government aid, not actually against government intervention?

9

Anonymous #5 2d

Nope, I’m also against price controls, excessive business regulation, high income taxes funding the aid, wealth taxes, policies to redistribute wealth, DEI and raced base merit systems, government run healthcare, gun control, the list goes on.

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

So you just hate poor people

13

Anonymous #2 2d

Nope, I just don’t think the government needs to provide everything for you. Go out and get a job.

-3

Anonymous OP 2d

This is what punches hardest and these dumb fucks don’t even know

10

Anonymous #1 2d

You can’t be realist and idealist I’ll tell you that much lol

10

Anonymous #1 2d

Can't pull yourself up by the bootstraps if you don't have boots. You just want people to suffer for being poor.

5

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

“I’m a cynic but an optimist”

6

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

Realist is what is true and idealist is what should be true. You can be both, maybe do some research.

-1

Anonymous #2 2d

But you can borrow the governments boots that other people paid for and when the government taxes everyone for other people boots to the pound those being taxes to hell then need boots. And then there’s no one to pay for your boots. See the flawed logic? It doesn’t work.

-1

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

Idealism sets the goal. Realism determines the method. Saying you can’t be both confuses values with strategy. Like I said, go do some research.

-2

Anonymous #1 2d

What doesn't work is Elon becoming the first trillionaire while millions of Americans can't afford basic necessities

3

Anonymous #2 2d

Success shouldn’t be penalized to subsidize unwillingness to work or illegal entry. Charity should be voluntary, and government aid should prioritize citizens and accountability.

-2

Anonymous #1 2d

Writing off millions of Americans as lazy just shows how ignorant and out of touch you are

1

Anonymous #2 2d

Not when I see it every freaking day. Let me know when you’re seeing it daily, then we can have a conversation, but as a medical professional is rampant. The amount of disability fraud is astronomical.

-3

Anonymous #7 2d

Sure, but I’m not your average “leftist”. I am a materialist and someone who isn’t quite as tolerant of reactionary thinking. It’s something we all need to work on.

1

Anonymous OP 2d

Ok fair. I’m a left wing Christian and am aware of many conventionally “intelligent” people/intellectuals who are theists so I just didn’t really understand why this post was phrased the way it was.

0

Anonymous #1 2d

Yeah but realism, idealism, “strategy”, and “ideals”, mean jack shit if materially nothing in reality lines up with either of those

6

Anonymous #1 2d

It’s just intellectual dishonesty and ignorance the dissonance does nothing good

6

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

*ignoring

1

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

That’s not intellectual dishonesty, it’s acknowledging trade-offs. Ideals set goals, realism deals with constraints. Ignoring incentives, fraud, and human behavior is what actually disconnects policy from reality.

1

Anonymous #7 2d

Absolutely, I recommend reading into why many leftists and all (Marxist) communists oppose religion as a institution and worldview, though I certainly respect your right to believe what you wish

6

Anonymous #1 2d

I think the people who ignore the most fraud is certainly on the center and right of the spectrum. I think materialists understand human behavior and the human condition the most lol.

1

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

That flips reality. Fraud isn’t ignored on the center/right, it’s explicitly accounted for. Assuming some people will exploit systems is understanding human behavior. Designing policy around good intentions instead of predictable incentives isn’t realism, it’s idealism with blind spots.

0

Anonymous #1 2d

Fraud is literally exploited by the champions of centrism, rightism and all of liberalism lmao. Not a person in that is corrupted. And if you think people who choose materialism don’t account for intentions, that’s silly conjecture.

1

Anonymous #1 2d

Actually, yes it was naturally occurring and she was a fully developed woman with menstruation and TWO unassisted pregnancies! It’s incredible stuff, and it was published in 2008! I’ll link the DOI for the article below for your reading pleasure. Biology is so fuckin cool!!!! https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2155

6

Anonymous #1 2d

So you're also against abortion/female healthcare regulations, regulations on personal sexuality/gender identities/expression, regulations on marijuana, etc?

1

Anonymous #3 2d

Here’s part of the abstract from the article that I cited. It’s wonderful stuff, and again, this is a study from 2008 where a woman had 46,XY karyotype and even passed it down to her daughter. Biology is never 100% on anything, so we can’t say that every single person with 46,XY is a man, let alone someone incapable of birth when it has been documented otherwise on multiple occasions. Life is beautiful!!!

4

Anonymous .gaia. 2d

Is not corrupted** omg

1

Anonymous #3 2d

It is, and I’m saying this not to start a fight but as someone who just did a deep dive into it. But the way pregnancy occurred was through mosaicism (it’s a mix of cell lines, think 46 XY and 45 X, kinda like a chimera [but not actually])

1

Anonymous #3 2d

But the PMC2190741 case was a rare natural fertility exception due to mosaicism, but in classic 46,XY Swyer syndrome people carry pregnancies only through IVF with donor eggs and hormone support.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

You’re in med school? Shit I hope you never treat me with that attitude I don’t want a slime ball like you anywhere near my body even if it’s not for pregnancy reasons.

6

Anonymous #1 1d

Dawg I’ve never in my life met a republican nurse unless it was one of those annoying bitches from high school that didn’t grow up. Either you’re one of those or you just live in a crazy red state. Also you talk a lot about pulling yourself up by the bootstraps but jobs are down across the market in part due to tariffs. It’s impossible for many to get jobs right now even those with years of experience.

7

Anonymous #1 1d

So the government helping people is worse than… the government putting gay people in concentration camps and starting wars with half the planet for no reason?

3

Anonymous #8 1d

Graduating in and year, and I really don’t care what you think, I have future jobs already lined up in medicine. Also, you’re acting like you get to choose your doctor in an emergency 🤣

1

Anonymous #8 1d

They’re actually very prevalent, they’re the ones working and not protesting, making good money, usually married to cops or firefighters who also lean right. And if you consider NY to be a “red state” have it, the rest of the state would love to get rid of the idiot soon to be mayor. And funny with the job situation, maybe it’s because people don’t want to actually do hard jobs? For example, veterinary medicine has an unemployment rate of 0.5%, nursing 2%, MD 0.3%. Outside of med is just as low.

1

Anonymous #9 1d

You realize the government “helping” in the terms of controlling every aspect of your life is putting you in a “concentration camp”. They decide when/if you have food, if you have money, if you have housing. You guys are all about my body my choice, but you want to have the already corrupt government to have more power if your body and life?

1

Anonymous #9 1d

As far as other countries wars, there is more than enough justification for many places.

1

I do agree with a lot of your points, if you would like I’d be willing to DM to share some of my views/debate. But I know if I were to going into it, the minute I say something they disagree with I’ll be responding to 5 people trying to argue with me at once, and makes the debate useless.

1