Anonymous #2 14h

Who else’s fault would it be? If it is a single mother then the father is out of the picture and did not raise the child.

1

Anonymous #1 14h

The person who commits the crime is at fault, the mother is the cause for some of the circumstances that contributed to it

4

Anonymous #1 14h

why do you talk like that?

0

Anonymous OP 14h

Like what

1

Anonymous #1 14h

idk just a vibe i picked up

0

Anonymous #3 14h

well if the kids mimicking the behavior of their parents then yeah theyre partly to blame, but u cant make it a blanket statement of “she just didnt raise him right” for any wrongdoing

1

Anonymous #1 14h

im pretty sure u have high functioning autism, ur male, and u watch red pill or bp content.

1

Anonymous OP 14h

probably mainly bo

1

Anonymous #2 14h

I’m just saying I don’t think this is a new thing in the “second wave of red pill” like degrading women has always been the thing

-1

Anonymous OP 14h

And I’m pretty sure you have a severe case of liberalism

1

Anonymous #1 14h

global/historical liberalism? or new gen social liberalism?

1

Anonymous OP 14h

i dont like either really. i think the original global definition of capital C conservatism is the best way to run a country, but not the american kind tho. i align more with marcuse’s critiques tho

1

Anonymous OP 14h

Socialist facist

1

Anonymous #1 14h

not quite lol. he was jewish and hes a marxist if anything

1

Anonymous OP 14h

I’m saying that’s what you are dummy

1

Anonymous OP 14h

but again, thats just what id want to live under. my opinion on how to run a country most smoothly is really complicated and i havent met a writer that portrays it right yet

1

Anonymous #1 14h

for what reason

0

Anonymous #4 14h

degrading women can mean anything. having a new specific way of doing it, that theyre doing increasingly more often, is the “second wave”

3

Anonymous OP 14h

i lurk in these spaces a lot and recently these accounts have been posting old court cases or body cam footage of stuff and putting a poll in the comments “who’s to blame: mother or _____” (insert whatever other possible answer could be, like the cops or the school) like theyre putting that thought into ppls heads indirectly

2

Anonymous OP 14h

And my point is just that I don’t see how you can materially differentiate between the shit Andrew Tate and Ben Shapiro and whoever else were saying about women and mothers 5-10 years ago from the shit people say now. It’s always been the case that they’ve portrayed women as overly emotional, incapable of properly raising children without a “father figure,” alluded to single mothers being sluts, etc. I just don’t know why we’re acting like any of this shit is really that new. It’s a revolving

0

Anonymous #4 14h

door of ragebait content that has always been meant to make you think less of women, minorities, LGBT people, etc. I mean the concept of the poll you’re describing wouldn’t even make sense to most people if not for years of subliminal messaging just like that

-1

Anonymous #4 14h

andrew tate and ben shapiro arent even the same kind of misogynist. i feel like ur just out of ur depths in this conversation like if we replace misogyny with the color red, we’re all talking about a new shade of red and ur sitting here telling us it all looks the same to u. thats a u problem lol

1

Anonymous OP 13h

Actually what I’m saying is that we’re now talking about three different shades of red, among many many others, and you’re somehow just counting 2. I just don’t know why we’re drawing the line on like this one “specific kind of misogyny” as if that’s a total vibe shift when it’s always just been a million different heads of the same dragon

3

Anonymous #4 13h

that literally makes no sense lol. this is what happened i said “hey guys theyre popularizing this new shade of red”….. and u said “uh, red’s always existed”…. and i said “this is a new shade theyre trying to popularize”….. and u said “idk how u tell the difference between this shade and Shapiro or Tate red”….. and i said ya those are red too but this is a different red

1

Anonymous OP 13h

so idk where ur getting that im only counting 2

1

Anonymous #5 13h

slightly unrelated but could we have a serious debate abt hypergamy? cause ive been trying to have a respectful conversation abt it for a while now and noone ever can

0

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 12h

That’s because Adam didn’t bite it first eve did

0

Anonymous #2 12h

Have you never encountered a hypothetical before?

1

Anonymous OP 10h

What you’re saying is more like “guys they just created a SECOND version of red that’s so different than the first red” and I’m saying we have a million shades of red and I don’t see what makes your shade of red so special that it deserves the distinction of “second red” when we’ve always had all these other reds

1

Anonymous #4 10h

thats not at all what im saying😭

1

Anonymous #4 10h

i said the new part is this specific kind of misogyny that theyre using to put subconcious impressions in people

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10h

the bible wouldve never been written that way because adam and eve didnt happen. that story was based on a summerian tablet that painted the same picture, a guess as to how conciousness and suffering entered the world

1

Anonymous OP 10h

And what are you not understanding about me saying I don’t really think there’s anything particularly that novel about what you’re describing compared to what people in that world have always done

1

Anonymous #4 9h

its novel in that theyre doing it collectively and commonly now in this way, to put this specific idea in peoples minds about mothers being to blame for childrens (not just minors btw) shortcoming. and like i said before, theyre doing it in a specific, also new way, of putting polls in comments

1

Anonymous OP 7h

Fire away

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Okay, fair enough.

1