I don't have a problem with it. If they want to bring a rifle to protect their protest then they can do that. But please don't point it at law enforcement. It'll be a mistake you won't be able to regret.
6
Anonymous3w
You don't have to agree with some reactionary on twitter to be on the right
-17
Anonymous3w
Don’t Interfere with law enforcement.
-21
Anonymous#13w
I'd say I'm right wing because I'm in favor of a free market that protects property rights but the only thing I have against those protestors is that they are kinda cucked for getting open carry licenses (but I guess that's the only choice when you live in a blue state)
-15
Anonymous#33w
Don’t interfere with deez nuts in your mom
53
Anonymous#33w
Carrying by itself doesn't interfere with law enforcement
37
Anonymous#33w
Are we only allowed to do this when we’re angry about an election result
33
Anonymous#33w
"comply or die" except bystanders die too
16
Anonymous#13w
I’m just saying trying to intimidate and interfere with feds leads to you getting capped quick
-10
Anonymous#63w
Literally this incident and now they’ve done a whole ass 180
14
Anonymous#63w
You mean the people defending their property from a mob? Surely your not comparing them to those who travel across the country to attack feds
-1
Anonymous#33w
True and fair. Let’s cap back.
10
Anonymous#13w
You’re a sissy liberal.
6
Anonymous#33w
the 2nd amendment, small government party is sure loving that boot lmao
6
Anonymous#93w
Propagandists really made a 4d chess move when they made the side that’s armed to the teeth the one that bends to anything corpos or politicians say.
5
Anonymous#33w
The person in OP’s post is also defending his property. Literally says it’s his neighborhood. And speaking of traveling across the country … you mean like Kyle Rittenhouse?