Anonymous #1 4w

You’re riding that fence harder than I ride my boyfriend, especially since we’re talking about Sam fucking Altman. literal technofascist working with Palantir to create and commodify an entire industry around automated warfare and mass surveillance. fucking ridiculous.

5

Anonymous #2 4w

I’m a man but guarantee I’ve been riding your bf harder. Sam Altman is literally the ceo of a nonprofit that is developing ai to better humanity.

-2

Anonymous #3 4w

as someone who actually works with artificial intelligence within computer science, and I’ll go ahead and assume you don’t, don’t try to gaslight anyone into thinking Altman is acting out of humanitarian interests. he’s one of the largest threats in the industry alone, as he consistently minimizes and avoids as much safety and alignment training as humanely possible, and is rushing development as fast as he can regardless of any concerns.

4

Anonymous #3 4w

You’re utterly psychotic if you genuinely believe what you stated, because I can assure you it’s completely void of any real-world evidence. nah tho pookie, you’ve been using that fence as your dildo though it seems

3

Anonymous #1 4w

So then we shouldn’t have fought a war to free ourselves from Britain, we shouldn’t have fought a war to end slavery, we shouldn’t have fought Germany or bombed Japan. We shouldn’t fight terrorists, we should allow criminals to go free, cause violence isn’t the answer right?

3

Anonymous OP 4w

In all fairness, while I agree with most of your points, in all honesty we definitely should not have dropped those bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima; aside from that I entirely agree. (I’ll admit it’s one of my “hot takes” as to my surprise most people don’t agree on that front)

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Humanity’s interest is the fastest development possible with no safety guardrails. It’s the most natural way, safety will follow after it’s been fully released and improved. And keep thinking that babe, if you’re curious to know I’ve been using the end of my brothers baseball bat and my gf’s hairbrush, I don’t sit on fences.

0

Anonymous #3 4w

you’re fucking delusional, and dangerous. I don’t know how you’ve been conditioned into this line of thought, but as someone in computer science I’m warning you it’s very dangerous. we do not entirely understand the depth of what we’ve created, and trusting the man who already settled on ending his biological life in favor of digital life (when the technology becomes available) is not good. and no, I wasn’t curious.

1

Anonymous #3 4w

You’re right on one count though: you’re not sitting on that fence, nor riding it. You’re on the wrong side of it lmao

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Yeah well to be fair I’m not in computer science and just need something to “solve” the SHA-3 hash for personal reasons and I’ll be happy. So I don’t really care about the safety bc I rarely ever talk to it or use it. Oh you brought it up earlier so I figured you were curious. Noted.

1

Anonymous #3 4w

Lmfao this era of automatic breaches is going to be a fucking trip, especially after the recent Anthropic report regarding its private model mythos Give it a decade or two, if that, and most modern encryption will likely be defunct anyway. The rise of accessible quantum computing, especially if it ever hits consumer level, will easily destroy any and all methods we currently have for encryption.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

(also don’t get me wrong, I work with AI daily and I research and develop more bio-inspired AI myself - I don’t think the entirety of AI is bad or something, in fact the opposite; but the way in which development is being pushed by the industry, as well as the commonly shared goal for said development, is dangerously scary)

1