Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Republicans actually read the Bible challenge
77 upvotes, 35 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Republicans actually read the Bible challenge"
upvote 77 downvote

user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

uh…yeah, because the abrahamic god indeed is non-binary by definition 💀

upvote 43 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

If they actually read the Bible they wouldn’t be conservatives

upvote 37 downvote
🐲
Anonymous 3w

This is hilarious it implies they can read 😭

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

God self-identified with He/Him pronouns

upvote 10 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous 3w

God is beyond the gender binary, I’m pretty sure. I’m okay with this take.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Nobody is disagreeing with this lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Is it tho? You wouldn’t refer to a rock as non-binary, its a rock, rocks dont have genders or sexes

upvote -4 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Isn’t God supposed to be more sentient than a rock?

upvote 25 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Does sentience necessitate gender?

upvote -4 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Generally only living things have genders

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Not even. Gender is socially constructed. You really think trees are concerned abt social constructs? Or the fish in the tank at the doctor’s office? No, it’s a pretty specifically human thing

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Gender is not socially constructed. Most animas either have female parts or male parts, minus the occasionally mutation

upvote -13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

Animals have reproductive organs because that is what they need to reproduce. So then why would one assume that god has that?

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

You’re talking about sex, not gender. Two different things

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

You are thinking of sex.

upvote 24 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

I mean, some animals are hermaphroditic and most plants have both sex organs in the flower, but the thing is, these things are alive. A rock is not

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Bro has never taken a biology class

upvote 6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Is God alive? Is god more than a concept? If god made humans in God’s image, god made both men and women, so…would god be both?

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Why would someone that is sentient with no need for reproductive organs have them

upvote 5 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Hence, god is either non-binary or a futanari

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Idk why this argument is still going ngl the Bible literally states god is genderless and that’s just how it is. Deal with it chuds.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Bacteria is alive and doesnt have reproductive organs

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Yeah because they reproduce asexually. Does the abrahamic god reproduce asexually?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

God does not reproduce nor does it have gender or sex, so again how could it be non-binary

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 3w

Non binary literally just means outside the binary of male and female, which is clearly where god sits

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

Rocks are non-binary

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

"gender is not constructed! [argument not about gender]"

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

i think the word we're looking for is "agender"

upvote 5 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 3w

Isn’t agender a subset of non-binary though

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> xi.jinping 3w

no. non-binary falls outside the gender binary but is still a gendered experience - with many enbies often feeling a mix of the two or some alternative "3rd" option. agender is lacking a gendered experience. no alternative. just not a gender

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 3w

pronouns ≠ gender

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

i see a few at least

upvote 3 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

That’s sex genius. Gender is uniquely human.

upvote 6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Basic and advanced biology states that sex and gender are separate…pls find me a peer reviewed study by a biologist or geneticist that state otherwise. I’ll wait.

upvote 17 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

That’s… not what that means.

post
upvote 1 downvote