
Your entire premise relies on the assumption that having more weapons made for killing people = a safer population. You’re also trying to put words in my mouth and act like some saint who cares about people’s lives when in reality you care more about tools used for killing. Thats just wrong, dude.
Yes I do, and if that were false then we would be seeing the worst massacres in history perpetrated by civilians in a country with relatively little gun rights infringement. Instead, we have seen the worst massacres in history perpetrated by government in countries where the government restricted the right to bear arms from their subjects.
The worst massacres in history have been committed during wartime by military forces against foreign military forces and civilians. I don’t disagree that populations have a right to defend themselves against oppressors and that guns have more than one use but in a regular, peaceful society it’s very silly to think that somehow having more guns makes everyone safe
How do you think they are getting the arms to traffic? And yes, there are states with effectively no gun laws. You can walk into a store and buy whatever with essentially no safeguards, no background check etc. not to mention you can they legally sell that to someone else with no paper trail. if it we’re not so insanely easy to buy guns in texas, it’d be much harder for them to buy guns in texas and traffic them elsewhere.