Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 1w
Libs are projecting so hard. Let’s go burn down cities because some guy ODd
US Politics icon
US Politics 1w
Congrats to Charlie 🎉
306 upvotes, 6 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Congrats to Charlie 🎉"
comment

24
upvote -11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

triggered 😂

upvote 16 downvote
🌊
Anonymous 1w

That’s the joke bc you guys never take political responsibility for someone’s deaths. This person is saying Charlie od bc you guys said Floyd od you stumbled on the joke dipshit it’s not projection lmao.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Idk how ppl look at the coroner’s report 5 years later and still somehow lie to themselves that he overdosed when it’s literally not listed as his cause of death.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w
post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Seems like you’re triggered

post
upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

someone’s a special snowflake 😂

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Instead you go into the toxicology and decide by looking at the blood concentrations you know better than the coroner. It’s crazy

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

The doctor who performed the autopsy testified under oath he died from neck compression

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Well when you’re one of these ppl you don’t listen to doctors, scientists, the ppl who’ve spent their entire lives studying this stuff, bc some talking head on Fox knows better..

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> blue__wave 1w

Floyd did OD tho

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

According to who, bc not the ppl who actually examined his body. But you know better of course

upvote 9 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

No he didn’t your opinion goes against the expert testimony we saw at his trial.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Here comes your armchair interpretation of the toxicology which completely disagrees with the actual report. Every single time smh

upvote 5 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Lmao true I can’t wait to hear how his fav right wing podcast analyzed the info.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> blue__wave 1w

Yes or no answer please: Did he have 5 times over what is considered to be a lethal dose of fent in his blood stream

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yes or no answer please: Did the doctor who performed the autopsy testify in court that his death was because of neck compression?

upvote 7 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yes I believe that’s true that he did have more than what the average person could take but you can build a tolerance to drugs dipshit.

upvote 1 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

That’s how drug addiction works you take more bc your body builds a tolerance towards the drug.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

No

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I don’t care about theatrics from Bidens currupt courts. You don’t survive that much fent in your system and the take down by hero chauvin was by the book

upvote -1 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You realized he was charged in state court as well and still lost? So it wasn’t just “Biden courts”.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> blue__wave 1w

All courts at the time were Bidens courts, especially in Minnesota

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

So are all courts now trump's courts?

upvote 1 downvote
🌊
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

How did Biden influence the jury’s choice?

upvote 2 downvote