Anonymous #1 1w

I guess yeah. The only thing I could think of would be like, lgb is whom you’d prefer to sleep with while tq+ relates to what you identify with. I think if that makes sense but it sorta doesn’t so I don’t know what they were on about

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Nah it’s them wanting to abandon trans people because they’re transphobic and see them as an obstacle for acceptance. It’s them thinking if they cut off the trans people then suddenly gay people will be accepted.

7

Anonymous #1 1w

i think it’s just separate issues. Why do all gay people have to automatically be involved in the fight for another group and if they don’t they’re a traitor or something. not caring isn’t transphobic

-5

Anonymous #5 1w

Because intersectional solidarity is vitally important. The trans and gay communities have fought for acceptance alongside each other for decades. Throwing trans people under the bus will not help gay people, they’re just slightly further down the bigot target list.

16

Anonymous #5 1w

saying you don’t care about the rights of a certain identity is discriminatory i’m afraid

13

Anonymous #2 1w

not caring as in it’s not my fight. It’s not discriminatory to not be involved. Discrimination is an active thing not passive

-3

so no trans people have been in the fight since the beginning go read a book and you can discriminate in your head girl so if you care about this group’s rights and wellbeing less than others means you are in fact discriminating

19

This is Marsha P Johnson and Sylvia Rivera erasure

12

Anonymous #2 1w

and that’s exactly why i would think some LGB doesnt want to be associated with T+ I don’t pay much attention to gaza that doesn’t mean it discriminatory. They’re fighting can fight their fight i’m not in the way. You can’t demand everyone associated with something HAS to have a certain mindset

-4

Anonymous #6 1w

english please

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

you don’t have to do anything but if you care about one group’s wellbeing and not about the other you are discriminating. it means you don’t believe in human rights as universal you choose who they apply to

12

Anonymous #2 1w

aka discriminating

10

Oh wow so you just know absolutely nothing about gay and trans history. There were trans women at stonewall. Trans people aren’t a new thing.

10

“The t+ is a ten year thing.” Hey, look at that, transgender activists fighting for gay rights in the movement IN THE 60S.

14

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

the widespread phenomenon of people saying they’re non binary with “xi xim” pronouns is 10+, yes

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

and i thought transvestite was a slur

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

No way you’re calling that widespread 💀

13

Anonymous #5 1w

So we’re just ignoring the many, many cultures that have more than two sets of pronouns? Also, terms were different in the 60s, you’d learn this from history books.

17

Anonymous #2 1w

never said I cared less. Just said i don’t want to be involved. Then again if i wasn’t doing anything anyway why do you even care what I think internally?

-2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

what cultures use more than 2 sets of pronouns as it relates to more than 2 genders.

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

Samoa

10

Anonymous #5 1w

well if you’re not doing anything anyway why do you care which letters are in the acronym you’re clearly not involved as is

11

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

That’s one example

14

Anonymous #5 1w

There’s also some gender-based traditions from native Hawaii, populations in indigenous communities in North and South America, Māori, etc.

18

Anonymous #5 1w

Aleut, Blackfoot, Cheyenne, Cree, Lakota, Navajo, Ojibwe, Zuni

12

Anonymous #5 1w

At the risk of sounding like an asshole, you don’t have the strongest grasp of history, do you?

13

Anonymous #5 1w

American indians.

1