Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
DEMOCRATS MUST WIN. WE MUST HAVE TRANSGENDER FOREVER
111 upvotes, 54 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "DEMOCRATS MUST WIN. WE MUST HAVE TRANSGENDER FOREVER"
upvote 111 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Right! Because Transgenderism is why gas prices are so high, there’s war in Iran, a genocide in Palestine, people can’t afford groceries, can’t afford medical care, can’t afford rent, can’t find jobs, and so many other critical things, but republicans are obsessed with other people’s genitals. Also, stop distracting from the TrumpStein files!

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Rigging the election by shredding republican ballots so we can have transgender forever

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

TRANSGENDER NOW, TRANSGENDER TOMORROW, TRANSGENDER FOR EVER

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

We haven’t even got transgender right now. We’ve got a corporately funded dying ad campaign to turn people’s identities into a product rather than treat them like people.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

No

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

I predict the republicans will win again because the average person is tired of this getting forced down people’s throats.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 9w

Those damn trans people buying up all the gas and hoarding it away from hard working Americans >:(

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

How has it been forced down your throats?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

How hasn’t it? There’s people saying get used to men going into women’s restrooms, have to use certain pronouns, and getting called cis when the average person doesn’t like being called it just to make trans people feel okay.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Oh no, you got called cis? Aww how awful, I’m sure that must be really hard! 🥺

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

This is why the average person will vote republican. I’m not even republican and I know they are going to win again.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Omfg you’re so fragile, why are you this triggered? 😭

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

You got me I’m so triggered. Im pissing and shitting my pants

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

that’s not why people use the word cis. ‘cis’ is the latin counterpart to ‘trans’. it is just a way to distinguish people when it is necessary. And my cousin who is a trans woman can’t use public bathrooms where she lives anymore because she could get charged with a felony. she can’t go in men’s bc she looks like a woman. They are just infringing on people’s rights & we should all be concerned about that

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Why would that issue mean more to you than all the other issues? Like for example the issues that #3 listed. it just doesn’t make sense bc less than 1% of the population is trans

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Wrong the origins of cis was created by John money. The original Latin word for cis means on this side of, which was used for landmarking. It’s to make women comfortable so that women do not enter their spaces. No, your cousin doesn’t have the right to enter women’s spaces just to accommodate your cousin.

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Because that 1% of the population is making a lot of demands on regular people. Let me ask you this, how important do you think mental health is?

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

You’re literally complaining abt the word cis lol

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 9w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Okay well that’s where it’s derived from and “on this side of” is the counterpart to the definition of the latin prefix trans which means “across”. But honestly whatever. it’s just really depressing that you would choose a party that’s doing so much damage just because people are trying to find a place for trans people in society

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

What demands??? And what does mental health have to do with anything? I just don’t see how trans people are a priority for policy-making at all right now

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Correct but again it was used for land marking. I didn’t choose anything, I’m making a logical prediction. It’s depressing that you affirm people’s mental illness rather than telling them the truth. The left is also doing damage too by them leaving the border up, and letting convicted felons with over 40 prior arrest lose then them killing people.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

That they have to be in women’s spaces, and have to be called certain names. These people are suffering from either gender dysphoria or body dysmorphia or both which are both mental disorders.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Okay well even if you feel that way, how is that more of a priority than our actual lives??

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

okay, but trans people are a small portion of the population. and i’d wager commit less cumulative violence (if you take into account scale and number) than, say, cis men with firearms. but even more than the number of people harmed/killed by gun violence in this country is the number of children suffering from food insecurity, single mothers who constantly worry about basic housing and food costs, or individuals who simply don’t get life saving care due to ridiculous medical costs

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9w

yes trans people and their influence on culture is loud. it’s one of the big talking pieces. but it’s… just not that important? the number of people it effects is rather small, and the amount of harm it could mitigate is also small compared to many other issues facing this nation

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Because your needs of invading women’s spaces isn’t a priority. There needs to be better mental health for people suffering with these disorders

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9w

Majority of violence with firearms is usually by people who are mentally ill. Honestly, it’s weird that people are using a term that was created by a pedophile. Oh no, I agree there’s a lot of other issues out there.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 9w

So women’s spaces are not important? I think the women that are affected by it would say otherwise. Well I can agree on that, but I can also say plenty of the problems today have very easy solutions but they just don’t get fixed

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

do you know anyone in real life who is having an issue with that? I don’t

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Yes I do, someone I used to work with was really uncomfortable sharing a bathroom with a trans woman coworker.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

Well the republican party is full of sell outs and i don’t think it’s worth it to support them. wealth inequality has gotten so much worse under trump because of everything he has done for his billionaire friends & the republican party has totally stood behind that the entire time

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

The democrat party is also full of sell outs too. They threw Biden under the bus multiple times, and are constantly at each other. Don’t act like Nancy Pelosi hasn’t done the same thing with her insider trading. It’s interesting how leftist will always call out the right but will never acknowledge of the faults of their own party.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

How do you know i don’t acknowledge the faults of the democratic party? no one likes nancy Pelosi and I don’t like anyone who is corrupt. But there are good number of democrats who aren’t corrupt while 90%+ of republicans are corrupt

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Because you are coming off incredibly bias. If no one likes her then why is she so popular among the members of her party? Did you speak out when Biden pardon his crackhead son? I wouldn’t say 90%+ are corrupt I would say maybe in the 50s%. The left is about the same too. There are good people on each side but can’t forget they are politicians

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

i am talking about how they have sided with trump on all his efforts to give billionaires tax cuts and do whatever he wants to do. all the systemic problems we have in this country he and his administration are making wealth, all to get away with exploiting people for money and power

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

making worse*

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #10 9w

Wow you really did something by responding with a chart to a comment that is only meant as an insult. Of course there’s going to be a higher amount when the population of people have this mental illness are only 1% of the population. It’s interesting that stupid people will keep using a word a pedophile created.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

It is so unfair to imply that transgender people are more likely to commit school shootings. Like that’s so unfair to all the people who don’t just because a few people have done it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

I never implied anything all I just said was get offended to go shoot up a school. This comment was just directly to this person and no one else. That’s your fault for making that assumption.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

The number/ratio is alarmingly high. Consider what having multiple identities that conflict does to a person internally and yes we should be as compassionate as we can, but there’s already a voice inside them telling them they need to sacrifice their sense of self (and occasionally some of their flesh) for the other named voice. That kind of incongruence often manifests violently when I plug in the search data and run it back historically. It wasn’t always called “transgenderism”.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Or rather, historically, it has often attempted to manifest violently depending on various environmental factors* You’re right. It doesn’t always balance out via violence, but often enough, it does. The domestic violence rates/incident reports are an alarming study as well. It’s not always school shootings.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

I mean heck, we just had a national news story about a mother with severe hormonal issues who didn’t even dawn a new identity kill her three children. Thoughts/phrases/words cluster in neuron according to emotional state and blood chemistry. What did people think would happen if we gave people who have barely formed an identity as a grown up a bunch of synthetic hormones?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

Cannot take anyone who says clancy was “just suffering from hormonal issues” seriously. Like is this the early 1900s again lol??

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

I said “severe hormonal issues” not “just suffering from hormonal issues”. Don’t misquote me.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

my point was that you called it hormonal issues at all

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

You saw the need to misquote me and then trivialize by replacing the word “severe” with “just”. That was not your point. If your issue was with me calling it hormonal issues you would have said that, but you didn’t. You accessed the creative portion of your imagination then attempted to alter my memory of something I just said. Which is one of the laziest attempts at gaslighting I’ve ever experienced.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 9w

minimizing psychosis into just “hormonal issues” just comes across as sexist. I am not judging you or whatever, I get it. It’s fine.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

She didn’t have psychosis her therapist said so.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

She told her husband and mom about her thoughts. I wouldn’t tell my therapist about being suicidal & most people wouldn’t. But it’s whatever, it’s fine if you believe that, i really don’t care to argue

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

I just don’t like the gender wars thing that’s going on about it

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

Your personal life is not relevant to this case. Also, there’s clear indicator someone’s going through psychosis I guarantee you someone who studies psychology, immensely, would know.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 9w

I mean, you can blame that on the women who are wearing pink shirts saying she is innocent.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 9w

People do this every time there is a big murder case. They assumed the same thing when that kid went missing and was found dead on family vacation in Japan, they assumed the parents did it when those girls went missing from their backyard

upvote 0 downvote