US Politics on Sidechat | Charlie Kirk was a master of trapping people in a pre-determined debate dialogue that eliminated any room for actual discourse while making himself look good, which made him a great propagandist for the elites.

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

US Politics 1w

Charlie Kirk was a master of trapping people in a pre-determined debate dialogue that eliminated any room for actual discourse while making himself look good, which made him a great propagandist for the elites.

Anonymous 1w

Not to mention bro would just farm content by “debating” like 200 people a day, clipping the 3 or 4 dumbest ones where he’s able to really “own” them, and kick out anyone who made good points so he could get to the dummies faster lmao

Anonymous 1w

Dude only debated college students (inexperienced debaters) for a reason

Anonymous 1w

He was almost always right tho

-1

Anonymous

#1 1w

😂

Anonymous

#1 1w

Bro an airline started funding pilot school to make it more accessible to minorities and he thought that meant they were handing pilot’s licenses to random black guys

Anonymous

#2 1w

Yea

Anonymous

#1 1w

He was wrong about what DEI is, trans people being disproportionately represented in shooting statistics, the 2020 election being rigged, the cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, lied about why he wasn’t accepted to West Point, promoted debunked claims about Floyd counterfeiting currency and dying of an overdose, etc. He was usually wrong, you either saw clips cut to make him look good or are also wrong on an objective and factual basis.